schedule presync stf events to the first sync block #339
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think the change to the scheduled behavior in #314 may have been a mistake. I thought that presync data was being scheduled with the original block which didn't make sense and was useless, but that only happened because of the
Math.max
usage and the block heights in the parallel chain being bigger (in particular, with emulated blocks this is always the case sinceSM_START_BLOCKHEIGHT
is 0) . Also, that PR didn't fix the issue for the carp/cardano primitives.So this restores the behavior to the way it worked before that PR for the scheduled data, but also fixes the original issue for the parallel evm and carp funnels.
If we actually don't want to schedule data during the presync like we are doing currently, we still should do it in the carp primitives. But I imagine it's actually more practical to schedule everything in the first stf? The only potential issue is that the first state transition could take a while if there is a lot of presync data.