Support for writing tests, particularly in a Zope3/ZTK environment, using zope.testing (nose2 may also work, but is not recommended).
Complete documentation is hosted at https://ntitesting.readthedocs.io/
nti.testing can be installed using pip, either from the git repository or from PyPI:
pip install nti.testing[testgres]
Use the testgres
extra to be able to use nti.testing.layers.postgres.
nti.testing provides a group of PyHamcrest matchers. There are both general-purpose matchers and matchers that are of use to users of zope.interface and zope.schema.
Matchers can be imported from the nti.testing.matchers module; the most commonly used matchers can be directly imported from nti.testing.
is_true and is_false check the bool value of a supplied object (we're using literals for explanation purposes, but it obviously makes more sense, and reads better, when the matched object is a variable, often of a more complex type):
>>> from hamcrest import assert_that, is_ >>> from nti.testing import is_true, is_false >>> assert_that("Hi", is_true()) >>> assert_that(0, is_false())
Next we come to matchers that support basic use of zope.interface
.
We can check that an object provides an interface and that a factory implements it:
>>> from zope.interface import Interface, Attribute, implementer >>> class IThing1(Interface): ... pass >>> class IThing2(Interface): ... pass >>> class IThings(IThing1, IThing2): ... got_that_thing_i_sent_you = Attribute("Did you get that thing?") >>> @implementer(IThings) ... class Thing(object): ... def __repr__(self): return "<object Thing>">>> from nti.testing import provides, implements >>> assert_that(Thing(), provides(IThings)) >>> assert_that(Thing, implements(IThings))
The attentive reader will have noticed that IThings
defines an
attribute that our implementation doesn't actually provide. This is
where the next stricter check comes in. verifiably_provides uses
the interface machinery to determine that all attributes and methods
specified by the interface are present as described:
>>> from nti.testing import verifiably_provides >>> assert_that(Thing(), verifiably_provides(IThing2, IThing1)) >>> assert_that(Thing(), verifiably_provides(IThings)) Traceback (most recent call last): ... AssertionError:... Expected: object verifiably providing <...IThings> but: Using class <class 'Thing'> the object <object Thing> has failed to implement interface ....IThings: The ....IThings.got_that_thing_i_sent_you attribute was not provided. <BLANKLINE>
If multiple attributes or methods are not provided, all such missing information is reported:
>>> class IThingReceiver(IThings): ... def receive(some_thing): ... """Get the thing""" >>> @implementer(IThingReceiver) ... class ThingReceiver(object): ... def __repr__(self): return "<object ThingReceiver>" >>> assert_that(ThingReceiver(), verifiably_provides(IThingReceiver)) Traceback (most recent call last): ... AssertionError:... Expected: object verifiably providing <...IThingReceiver> but: Using class <class 'ThingReceiver'> the object <object ThingReceiver> has failed to implement interface ....IThingReceiver: The ....IThings.got_that_thing_i_sent_you attribute was not provided The ....IThingReceiver.receive(some_thing) attribute was not provided <BLANKLINE>
zope.interface
can only check whether or not an attribute or
method is present. To place (arbitrary) tighter constraints on the
values of the attributes, we can step up to zope.schema
and the
validly_provides matcher:
>>> from zope.schema import Bool >>> class IBoolThings(IThing1, IThing2): ... got_that_thing_i_sent_you = Bool(required=True) >>> @implementer(IBoolThings) ... class BoolThing(object): ... def __repr__(self): return "<object BoolThing>"
validly_provides is a superset of verifiably_provides:
>>> from nti.testing import validly_provides >>> assert_that(BoolThing(), validly_provides(IThing1, IThing2)) >>> assert_that(BoolThing(), validly_provides(IBoolThings)) Traceback (most recent call last): ... AssertionError:... Expected: (object verifiably providing <...IBoolThings> and object validly providing ....IBoolThings) but: object verifiably providing <....IBoolThings> Using class <class 'BoolThing'> the object <object BoolThing> has failed to implement interface ....IBoolThings: The ....IBoolThings.got_that_thing_i_sent_you attribute was not provided. <BLANKLINE>
For finer grained control, we can compare data against schema fields using validated_by and not_validated_by:
>>> from nti.testing import validated_by, not_validated_by >>> field = IBoolThings.get('got_that_thing_i_sent_you') >>> assert_that(True, is_(validated_by(field))) >>> assert_that(None, is_(not_validated_by(field)))
The aq_inContextOf matcher uses the concepts from Acquisition to check parent/child relationships:
>>> from nti.testing import aq_inContextOf >>> class Parent(object): ... pass >>> class Child(object): ... __parent__ = None >>> parent = Parent() >>> child = Child() >>> child.__parent__ = parent>>> assert_that(child, aq_inContextOf(parent))
Support for test fixtures can be found in nti.testing.base and
nti.testing.layers. The base
package includes fully-fleshed
out base classes for direct use, while the layers
package mostly includes
mixins that can be used to construct your own test layers.
The base
package makes a distinction between "normal" and "shared"
fixtures. Normal fixtures are those that are used for a single test
case. They are established via setUp
and torn down via
tearDown
.
In contrast, shared fixtures are expected to endure for the duration
of all the tests in the class or all the tests in the layer. These are
best used when the fixture is expensive to create. Anything that
extends from nti.testing.base.AbstractSharedTestBase creates a shared fixture.
Through the magic of metaclasses, such a subclass can also be assigned
as the layer
property of another class to be used as a test layer
that can be shared across more than one class.
The most important bases are nti.testing.base.ConfiguringTestBase and
nti.testing.base.SharedConfiguringTestBase. These are both fixtures for
configuring ZCML, either from existing packages or complete file
paths. To use these, subclass them and define class attributes
set_up_packages
and (if necessary) features
:
>>> from nti.testing.base import ConfiguringTestBase >>> import zope.security >>> class MyConfiguringTest(ConfiguringTestBase): ... set_up_packages = ( ... 'zope.component', # the default configuration by name ... # a named file in a named package ... ('ftesting.zcml', 'zope.traversing.tests'), ... # an imported module ... zope.security, ... # Our own package; in a test, this will mean the parent ... # package ... ".")
We would then proceed to write our test methods. The packages that we
specified will be set up and torn down around every test method. In
addition, the zope.testing
cleanup functions will also run around
every test method.
Having a clock that's guaranteed to move in a positive increasing way
in every call to time.time
is useful. nti.testing.time
provides a decorator to accomplish this that ensures values always are
at least the current time and always are increasing. (It is not thread
safe.) It can be applied to functions or methods, and optionally takes
a granularity
argument:
>>> from nti.testing import time_monotonically_increases >>> from nti.testing.time import reset_monotonic_time >>> @time_monotonically_increases(0.1) # increment by 0.1 ... def test(): ... import time ... t1 = time.time() ... t2 = time.time() ... assert t2 == t1 + 0.1, (t2, t1)>>> test()
There are some other assorted utilities, including support for working with ZODB in nti.testing.zodb. See the API documentation for details.