Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the in-progress cache #689

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

Remove the in-progress cache #689

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

eljobe
Copy link
Member

@eljobe eljobe commented Sep 17, 2024

The latest history commitment provider implementation is more
efficient and we no longer need the cache to optimize it.

Fixes NIT-2324

The latest history commitment provider implementation is more
efficient and we no longer need the cache to optimize it.

Fixes NIT-2324
@eljobe eljobe self-assigned this Sep 17, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 37.50000% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 59.54%. Comparing base (782f09f) to head (4c6c613).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #689      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.09%   59.54%   -0.56%     
==========================================
  Files          50       49       -1     
  Lines        8759     8713      -46     
==========================================
- Hits         5264     5188      -76     
- Misses       3488     3518      +30     
  Partials        7        7              

eljobe added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
This will cause us to deliberately decide if we need to increase the
test size if they get bigger. It also prevents a warning in the
output of `bazel test //...`

Intentionally ignoring the in-progress cache as it is going away
in #689
@eljobe eljobe merged commit 8720acb into main Sep 17, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@eljobe eljobe deleted the bye-bye-cache branch September 17, 2024 13:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants