Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[14.0] l10n_br_base, l10n_br_account: Cadastro de chaves PIX no Parceiro. #2123
[14.0] l10n_br_base, l10n_br_account: Cadastro de chaves PIX no Parceiro. #2123
Changes from 2 commits
3b24c95
f4642b2
05863d6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@antoniospneto Estou com dúvida sobre este método já que a principio por default os parceiros não tem um company_id definido. Talvez possamos incrementar testando se o pais do parceiro é diferente de BR. Fora isso, acredita que seja válido considerar a empresa selecionada no momento também?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Realmente, a validação que fiz na época não é uma boa.
Acho que o código do país do parceiro vai ser melhor 👍🏻
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ao invés de chamar o check_vals nos métodos create e write você pode adicionar a notação @api.constrains no método check_vals
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@netosjb, você chegou a ver essa mudança? Daria para usar o api.constraints() no método check_vals e não sobre escrever os método create e write...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
que estranho, eu tinha respondido essa questão, mas meu comentário sumiu.
Sim, eu tentei fazer com a notação, porém no meu uso não deu certo, é que além de fazer a validação eu faço a normalização dos campos que altera o valor do mesmo. pelo fato do valor está sendo alterado, com o api.constraints() o método entra em um loop infinito, fica chamando de forma recursiva até atingir o maximo e estourar uma exception.