Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove getindex function for OrderedDict #141

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

oameye
Copy link
Member

@oameye oameye commented Jan 3, 2024

Remove getindex function for OrderedDict as it was unintuitive and not used internally.

Should only be merged after #134 and #138

@oameye oameye requested a review from jdelpino January 3, 2024 08:51
@oameye oameye added the formatting Simple style and formatting issue. Does not change functionality. label Jan 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@jdelpino jdelpino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure if this can conflict with the plotting routines (we don't have tests for some of those). I would keep the function until this is elucidated.

@oameye
Copy link
Member Author

oameye commented Jan 4, 2024

I normally checked, but I agree we need more tests. This is one of my todo's and with the seed PR it will be a lot easier to write better tests.

@jkosata
Copy link
Member

jkosata commented Jan 13, 2024

So is this good to merge? This needs to go, redefining a package method results in the kind of bugs that take hours to fix.

@oameye
Copy link
Member Author

oameye commented Jan 13, 2024

Yes, this can be merged

@jkosata jkosata merged commit b05c56e into master Jan 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@jkosata jkosata deleted the remove-getindex-OrderedDict branch January 13, 2024 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
formatting Simple style and formatting issue. Does not change functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants