xpra: 5.0.9 -> 6.1.2

[hxtmdev]

Description of changes

Update xpra to newest version 6.1.0

• libfakeXinerama patch removed as it is no longer used upstream but library left unchanged since it exists in its own repository and may be used / useful elsewhere
• fix-122159.patch removed as it appears to be obsoleted by an upstream change

I tested seamless mode without sound with an upstream 6.1 client on Debian, I did not test the module, sound, most other features. Tests in that direction as well as a review of #279974 by people that use it would be appreciated!

breakages as per nixpkgs-review unchanged

2 packages failed to build:
xpraWithNvenc xpraWithNvenc.dist

3 packages built:
run-scaled xpra xpra.dist

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[aqrln]

fix-122159.patch removed as it appears to be obsoleted by an upstream change

I'm not sure I follow, the linked commit seems to be a purely stylistic change with no change in behaviour

[hxtmdev]

I'm not sure I follow, the linked commit seems to be a purely stylistic change with no change in behaviour

You are very much correct! Not sure how I managed to misread it like that. Thanks!

[aqrln]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 332295 run on aarch64-linux 1

2 packages failed to build:

• xpraWithNvenc
• xpraWithNvenc.dist

3 packages built:

• run-scaled
• xpra
• xpra.dist

[aqrln]

Sorry I didn't have time to take a look yet, will try to do it asap.

[hxtmdev]

Updated to 6.1.1 from 6h ago.

[hxtmdev]

updated to 6.1.2

[emilazy]

Sorry for how long this PR has languished. I was reminded of it when noticing that Xpra fails to build on staging-next due to the FFmpeg 7 upgrade, so I’m merging this now. There’s a 6.1.3 out now too which I promise to review faster if you do the bump :)