hiddify-next: init at 1.1.1

[wenjinnn]

init with appimage version
fix #285375, related #287770
also add wenjinnn to maintainer-list

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[donovanglover]

Welcome to nixpkgs! Make sure to put new packages in pkgs/by-name. You can also format your code with nixfmt-rfc-style

[donovanglover]

When you're done, make sure that you have 2 separate commits in this order:

1. maintainers: add wenjinnn
2. hiddify-next: init at 1.1.1

[wenjinnn]

When you're done, make sure that you have 2 separate commits in this order:

1. maintainers: add wenjinnn
2. hiddify-next: init at 1.1.1

All done! thanks for the suggestion and guide.

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/3855

[wenjinnn]

Seems like after 24.05 release, appimageTools.wrapType2 behavior changed. after 24.05, this command will fail:

    mv $out/bin/hiddify-next-1.1.1 $out/bin/hiddify

now the location $out/bin/hiddify-next-1.1.1 change to $out/bin/hiddify-next, so I make some change to adapt this behavior.

[linsui]

Since hidiffy violates the license used by sing-box I thought we shouldn't package it.

[wenjinnn]

Well, I'm ok with that reason. should we close this PR now or wait for confirmation from others?