Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update request: rquickshare build from source #357017

Open
1 task done
taha-yassine opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #357673
Open
1 task done

Update request: rquickshare build from source #357017

taha-yassine opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #357673
Assignees
Labels
9.needs: package (update) This needs a package to be updated

Comments

@taha-yassine
Copy link
Contributor

Now that Tauri has been updated to v2 #346277, can rquickshare be built from source instead of wrapping the AppImage?
The bulk of the work has already been done here Martichou/rquickshare#241

Package Information

  • Package name: rquickshare
  • Latest released version: 0.11.2
  • Current version on the unstable channel: 0.11.2
  • Current version on the stable/release channel: 0.8.2

Checklist

Notify maintainers

@luftmensch-luftmensch


Note for maintainers: Please tag this issue in your PR.


Add a 👍 reaction to issues you find important.

@taha-yassine taha-yassine added the 9.needs: package (update) This needs a package to be updated label Nov 18, 2024
@HannesGitH
Copy link
Contributor

HannesGitH commented Nov 20, 2024

i would glady move my work over from the upstream flake, but i'm a little bit hesitant to just duplicate all the logic, is there guidance on how to downstream flakes to nixpkgs?

as i also asked in discourse (next message):

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This issue has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/adding-flake-to-nixpkgs/20456/9

@HannesGitH
Copy link
Contributor

HannesGitH commented Nov 20, 2024

the peeps over at discourse convinced me duplicating the derivation is currently the only sensible way, so i'll do that as soon as i find some spare time :)

@HannesGitH HannesGitH self-assigned this Nov 20, 2024
HannesGitH added a commit to HannesGitH/nixpkgs that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2024
@HannesGitH HannesGitH linked a pull request Nov 20, 2024 that will close this issue
13 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
9.needs: package (update) This needs a package to be updated
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants