Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/support dbr 15.x #161

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

Feature/support dbr 15.x #161

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

pariksheet
Copy link
Collaborator

@pariksheet pariksheet commented Sep 17, 2024

Update python dependancies to resolve conflict with DBR15.x also support DBR 11.x and above.

Description

System requirement for DBR15

System environment
Operating System: Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS

Java: Zulu 8.78.0.19-CA-linux64
Scala: 2.12.18
Python: 3.11.0
R: 4.3.2
Delta Lake: 3.2.0

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

on databricks workflows using 15.4 LTS.

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Copy link
Collaborator

@asingamaneni asingamaneni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@asingamaneni asingamaneni merged commit ef2a5e0 into main Sep 17, 2024
2 checks passed
@asingamaneni asingamaneni deleted the feature/support_dbr_15.x branch September 17, 2024 17:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants