fix(evm-keeper): better utilize ERC20 metadata during FunToken creation #2074
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2074 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 65.04% 65.06% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 270 270
Lines 17050 17068 +18
==========================================
+ Hits 11091 11105 +14
- Misses 5021 5023 +2
- Partials 938 940 +2
|
Unique-Divine
deleted the
2073-evm-use-the-erc20-metadata-to-set-the-name-and-display-for-a-bank-coin
branch
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
CHANGELOG.md (5)
Line range hint
31-131: Overall, the Unreleased section is well-structured, but consider these improvements:
- The "State Machine Breaking" subsection is quite long and could benefit from further categorization or grouping of related changes.
- Some entries lack pull request numbers (e.g., line 61). Ensure all entries have associated PR numbers for traceability.
- Consider adding brief explanations for some of the more complex or impactful changes to help users understand their implications.
These changes would enhance the readability and usefulness of the changelog for users and developers.
Line range hint
133-170: The v1.0.0 section is informative, but could be enhanced:
- Consider adding a brief description of the significance of this release as the mainnet genesis version.
- The "State Machine Breaking" subsection contains only one item. It might be worth elaborating on why this change was necessary for the mainnet release.
- In the Features subsection, some entries lack detail. For example, the entry about the
devgasmodule could benefit from a brief explanation of its purpose.Adding these details would provide more context for users about the importance of this major release.
Line range hint
172-590: The changelog entries for versions v0.21.11 to v0.19.4 are informative, but could be more consistent:
- Some versions (e.g., v0.21.11) have very brief entries, while others (e.g., v0.19.4) are much more detailed. Consider standardizing the level of detail across all versions.
- For versions with minimal information (like v0.21.10), consider adding more context about the changes made.
- The "State Machine Breaking" sections in some versions (e.g., v0.19.4) are very long. Consider grouping related changes or providing summaries for easier digestion.
- Ensure all entries have associated PR numbers for consistency and traceability.
Improving consistency across these entries would make it easier for users to understand the evolution of the project across these versions.
Line range hint
592-1024: The changelog entries for versions v0.16.3 to v0.9.2 provide good historical context, but could be enhanced:
- Consider adding brief summaries at the start of each version's entry to highlight the most significant changes or the overall focus of that release.
- Some versions (e.g., v0.11.0) have very detailed entries, while others (e.g., v0.9.2) are more concise. Try to maintain a consistent level of detail across all versions.
- For breaking changes, especially in earlier versions, consider adding more context about why the change was necessary and its impact on users.
- Ensure all entries have associated PR numbers for consistency and to facilitate further investigation if needed.
Enhancing these earlier entries would provide valuable historical context for the project's development trajectory.
Line range hint
1-1024: The overall structure and formatting of the changelog is good, but consider these improvements:
- The header with guiding principles is valuable. Consider moving it to a separate CONTRIBUTING.md file to keep the changelog focused on actual changes.
- Ensure consistent formatting of version headers. Some use H2 (##) while others use H1 (#). Standardize this across all versions.
- Consider adding links to compare views between versions (e.g., Full Changelog) for each version entry.
- For the Unreleased section, consider adding a link to compare with the latest release.
- Ensure consistent use of bullet points or dashes for list items across all sections.
These changes would improve the overall readability and navigability of the changelog.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- proto/buf.yaml (2 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_erc20.go (4 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_erc20_test.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
proto/buf.yaml (4)
Line range hint
4-8: LGTM. Improved formatting.The indentation correction for the
buf.build/cosmos/gogo-protodependency improves readability and maintains consistent formatting.
26-26: LGTM. Added newline at EOF.Adding a newline at the end of the file is a good practice. It improves compatibility with various text processing tools and version control systems.
Line range hint
1-26: Overall, the changes in this file look good.The modifications to
proto/buf.yamlimprove the project's naming conventions, formatting, and file structure. These changes align well with the PR's objectives of enhancing the project's overall structure. The updated name in the Buf Schema Registry and the formatting improvements contribute to better maintainability and consistency across the project.
2-3: LGTM. Verify consistency across the project.The update to the
namefield frombuf.build/NibiruChain/nibirutobuf.build/nibiru-chain/nibirureflects a shift to a lowercase naming convention, which is a good practice. This change aligns with modern naming conventions and improves consistency.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any inconsistencies, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old name:
x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_erc20_test.go (3)
10-10: LGTM: New import for bank package.The addition of the bank package import is appropriate for the new assertions related to bank metadata. Using an alias enhances code readability.
105-120: Excellent addition of bank metadata assertions.These new assertions effectively verify that the ERC20 metadata is correctly utilized when creating the corresponding bank denomination. This aligns perfectly with the PR objective of better utilizing ERC20 metadata during FunToken creation. The assertions cover all relevant aspects of the metadata, including:
- Description: Clearly formatted and informative.
- DenomUnits: Correctly includes both the bank denomination and the ERC20 symbol.
- Base, Display, Name, and Symbol: All derived from the ERC20 metadata.
This change significantly improves the test coverage and ensures that the FunToken creation process accurately reflects the original ERC20 token's properties.
Line range hint
1-288: Summary: Excellent implementation of ERC20 metadata utilization in FunToken creation.The changes in this file successfully address the PR objectives by:
- Adding comprehensive assertions to verify the correct utilization of ERC20 metadata in creating bank denominations.
- Ensuring that the created FunToken accurately reflects the properties of the original ERC20 token.
These enhancements significantly improve the test coverage and align perfectly with the goal of better leveraging ERC20 metadata during the FunToken mapping creation process.
x/evm/keeper/funtoken_from_erc20.go (3)
117-117: Variable renaming enhances clarityRenaming
infotoerc20Infoimproves readability by clearly indicating that the variable contains ERC20 metadata.
134-134: Improved modularity withToBankMetadatamethodUsing
erc20Info.ToBankMetadata(bankDenom, erc20)encapsulates the metadata conversion logic, enhancing code modularity and maintainability.
156-204: Well-structuredToBankMetadatamethodThe
ToBankMetadatamethod effectively converts ERC20 metadata tobank.Metadata, handling cases where the name or symbol might be missing. This improves code reuse and readability.
| // The [Wrapped Ether contract] is a good example for reference. | ||
| // | ||
| // ```solidity | ||
| // constract WETH9 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Typo in Solidity keyword 'contract'
In the example code provided in the documentation, there is a typo in the keyword contract.
Apply this diff to fix the typo:
-// constract WETH9 {
+// contract WETH9 {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // constract WETH9 { | |
| // contract WETH9 { |
| // ```solidity | ||
| // constract WETH9 { | ||
| // string public name = "Wrapped Ether"; | ||
| // string public symbol = "WETH" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing semicolon in Solidity example
The line should end with a semicolon for correct Solidity syntax.
Apply this diff to fix the syntax:
-// string public symbol = "WETH"
+// string public symbol = "WETH";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // string public symbol = "WETH" | |
| // string public symbol = "WETH"; |
Purpose / Abstract
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Tests