Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update API Settings #470

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023
Merged

Update API Settings #470

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 23, 2023

Conversation

garrettmflynn
Copy link
Member

fix #469

Kept in the same structure for easier validation of their existence—though can still move the staging key around if you'd like. What header should we put that under?

@garrettmflynn garrettmflynn self-assigned this Oct 23, 2023
@CodyCBakerPhD
Copy link
Collaborator

This already looks better

What header should we put that under?

I would have said 'Developer' perhaps, but not sure right now.

Let's see how this plays out for the next round of tests (we'll provide the API keys and dandi sets though of course)

@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD merged commit fe407f4 into main Oct 23, 2023
7 checks passed
@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD deleted the update-api-settings branch October 23, 2023 16:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make staging key in settings not strictly required
2 participants