-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Produce proofs for Sign, Max, Absolute Value and Disjunction constraints #689
Produce proofs for Sign, Max, Absolute Value and Disjunction constraints #689
Conversation
Added removeIf wrapper function
Fixed Identation
Fixed indentation
Fixed indentation
Correct version of file
Fixed formatting
Fixed formatting
Added a test of removeIf() method
Added a test of const operator[]
if ( variable == _b ) | ||
{ | ||
if ( bound > 0 ) | ||
if ( FloatUtils::gt( bound, 0 ) && ( !proofs || !phaseFixed() ) ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand the logic of the second conjunct. If proofs are off, this is the normal case - sure. But if they are on, what does the phase matter? Please make it clearer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If proofs are on and the phase is fixed, then we have a row in the tableau that corresponds exactly to this phase. Thus we don't need to update a lemma and we can skip this part. An alternative solution would be to add a conditional, that will deduce bound without a lemma in the case the phase is fixed. What do you think?
regress/regress1/CMakeLists.txt
Outdated
@@ -164,5 +164,4 @@ marabou_add_input_query_test(1 ACASXU_maxtest2.ipq unsat "--prove-unsat" "ipq") | |||
# Sign | |||
marabou_add_input_query_test(1 deep_6_index_5566.ipq unsat "--prove-unsat" "ipq") | |||
marabou_add_input_query_test(1 deep_6_index_5567.ipq unsat "--prove-unsat" "ipq") | |||
marabou_add_input_query_test(1 deep_6_index_5525.ipq unsat "--prove-unsat" "ipq") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What was problematic about this test?
This reverts commit f3c7a73.
Just a quick reminder that if you're adding functionality, it would be great to get an entry in the CHANGELOG file. |
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ | |||
# Changelog | |||
|
|||
## Version 1.2.0 | |||
|
|||
* Added proof producing versions for Sign, Max, Absolute Value and Disjunction constraints |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we're still on v1.1.0 actually as it hasn't been released. Maybe the v1.1.0
title should Next release
to avoid confusion?
No description provided.