Panels TEA Run - DO NOT MERGE #1208
Conversation
lixiliu
changed the title
project_national/panel_upgrades.yml
Outdated
| elec_folder: data/cambium/2022/LRMER_MidCase_15 | ||
|
|
||
| utility_bills: | ||
| - scenario_name: Bills |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need additional input here for updated bill calc? I imagine we'd want the latest state avg rates, at least 2023 level.
https://github.com/NREL/resstock/tree/schedule_based_appliance_from_develop/resources/data/simple_rates
project_national/panel_upgrades.yml
Outdated
| emissions: | ||
| - scenario_name: LRMER_MidCase_15 | ||
| type: CO2e | ||
| elec_folder: data/cambium/2022/LRMER_MidCase_15 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Let's use the one that RESNET prefers... I think it's the Low RE case with a specific levelization period, could you check with Phil and Elaina on that?
| #### 1.2 Federal Minimum Heat Pump With Electric Backup, 2 options #### | ||
| - &1_fed_min_ashp_ducted | ||
| option: HVAC Heating Efficiency|ASHP, SEER 15.05, 8.82 HSPF, Max Load # same as base option | ||
| apply_logic: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
*logic_ducted_hvac_no_ashp
There was a problem hiding this comment.
try to use this reference at the first time. But got an error when validate the yml file. It looks like the logic that we referred should be in a same upgrade measure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could be a question for Rajendra
|
|
||
| - &2_fed_min_mshp_ductless | ||
| option: HVAC Heating Efficiency|MSHP, SEER 14.5, 8.33 HSPF, Max Load # federal minimum is SEER 14.3, but 14.5 is lowest SEER in baseline ResStock | ||
| apply_logic: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
*logic_ductless_hvac_no_mshp
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ditto, if use the reference, got an error when validate the yml file.
| - HVAC Has Ducts|Yes | ||
| - HVAC Heating Type|Non-Ducted Heating | ||
| - not: HVAC Heating Type And Fuel|Electricity ASHP | ||
| costs: *costs_ashp_ducted_8-82_HSPF |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This cost has electric backup, not the same, make sure all HP with existing backup has different HP costs than HP with electric backup
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Makes sense. Largeee use the same cost for HP with existing backup and HP with electric backup.
#Cost Source in largee: Custom regression by Brennan Less. Ducted heat pump project costs were regressed on nameplate tons and HSPF. Shall we reach out to Brennan for the cost of HP with different backup
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Think so, let's note that in the intent doc
| - not: HVAC Cooling Efficiency|Shared Cooling | ||
| - HVAC Has Ducts|No | ||
| - not: HVAC Heating Type And Fuel|Electricity MSHP | ||
| costs: *costs_mshp_ductless_8-33_HSPF |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
different cost than MSHP with integrated electric backup
| - upgrade_name: 2.7 BAU Electrification with Existing Fuel Backup with Envelope | ||
| options: | ||
| #### 1.0 Common Options For Heat Pump with existing backup, 8 options #### | ||
| - *hp_exist_bkup_heating_fuel |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was thinking you can leverage apply_package_logic to further exclude shared systems, but this is okay!
project_national/panel_upgrades.yml
Outdated
| #### 1.2 Federal Minimum Heat Pump With Electric Backup, 2 options #### | ||
| - *1_fed_min_ashp_ducted | ||
| - *2_fed_min_mshp_ductless | ||
| #### 2.1 Electric Water Heating, 4 options #### ##TO DO evise it to 120V HPWH |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TO BE UPDATED. If you are testing the run before this is updated, I'd suggest just commenting out the entire upgrade package. Same for the others containing the 120V HPWH
Pull Request Description
yml review