Removed lines causing latex error and clean up

[JasonGlazer]

Pull request overview

• Fixes a latex error introduced from Add Reports to Support createRMD - ruleset model description #10372

Pull Request Author

Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.

• Title of PR should be user-synopsis style (clearly understandable in a standalone changelog context)
• Label the PR with at least one of: Defect, Refactoring, NewFeature, Performance, and/or DoNoPublish
• Pull requests that impact EnergyPlus code must also include unit tests to cover enhancement or defect repair
• Author should provide a "walkthrough" of relevant code changes using a GitHub code review comment process
• If any diffs are expected, author must demonstrate they are justified using plots and descriptions
• If changes fix a defect, the fix should be demonstrated in plots and descriptions
• If any defect files are updated to a more recent version, upload new versions here or on DevSupport
• If IDD requires transition, transition source, rules, ExpandObjects, and IDFs must be updated, and add IDDChange label
• If structural output changes, add to output rules file and add OutputChange label
• If adding/removing any LaTeX docs or figures, update that document's CMakeLists file dependencies

Reviewer

This will not be exhaustively relevant to every PR.

• Perform a Code Review on GitHub
• If branch is behind develop, merge develop and build locally to check for side effects of the merge
• If defect, verify by running develop branch and reproducing defect, then running PR and reproducing fix
• If feature, test running new feature, try creative ways to break it
• CI status: all green or justified
• Check that performance is not impacted (CI Linux results include performance check)
• Run Unit Test(s) locally
• Check any new function arguments for performance impacts
• Verify IDF naming conventions and styles, memos and notes and defaults
• If new idf included, locally check the err file and other outputs

[JasonGlazer]

I should have called attention to the change in how I showed tables in the original pull request. Instead of trying to reproduce some of these very wide tables, I just used an image of the table. To facilitate searching, I also included a list of the column names. I would like @Myoldmopar @mjwitte and @rraustad to take a look at the output details doc for the Equipment Summary table for Chillers, Boilers, Cooling Towers and Fluid Coolers, Plant or Condenser Loop, and Air Terminals. Here is a screen shot of the boiler page.

[Myoldmopar]

Awesome, thanks for the quick fix up, @JasonGlazer. The documentation build passed happily now, and the rendered output details file is here for convenience:

OutputDetailsAndExamples.pdf

I see all the table images you used but also laid out the column names as bullets. That's nice. I guess personally I wouldn't have worried about getting a full image in there since you were already laying out the column names, but it's kinda nice, so I say leave it. I didn't go in and scrutinize every column name or anything, but spot checking looked good.

I'm inclined to merge to clean up the doc build in develop, please lay out any concerns soon-ish.

[rraustad]

Where is the definition of Reference/Rated Capacity/Efficiency? I wanted to see what these columns represented.

[JasonGlazer]

I think the rated and reference are from the chillers that use those inputs and are left blank if those inputs aren't part of the input object.

[JasonGlazer]

Looks like the CI came back clean (no surprise since it did not touch anything but a .tex file).

[Myoldmopar]

I'm going to go ahead and drop this in to clean up other PRs, thanks @JasonGlazer