Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged the atms_n20 yaml file into RDASApp. #236

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

xyzemc
Copy link
Contributor

@xyzemc xyzemc commented Nov 26, 2024

This PR is going to merge the ATMS NOAA_20 JEDI yaml file into RDASApp validated yaml file templates.
As the test in issue #203, atms_n20 data has been tested in MPAS_JEDI including all QC filters and bias correction. Not only the ioda data converted from regular feed bufr data has been tested, but also the ioda data converted from combined regular feed, DBNet, and ESRs bufr data has been tested too.
In addition, this atms_n20 yaml file has included the online domain check filters as described in and issue #224, and removed the 'circle domain check' filter

The Ens3Dvar ctests has passed with this yaml file added on top of the existing yaml file templates.


1/1 Test #3: rrfs_mpasjedi_2024052700_Ens3Dvar ...   Passed  1574.84 sec

The following tests passed:
        rrfs_mpasjedi_2024052700_Ens3Dvar

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 1

Label Time Summary:
mpi            = 1574.84 sec*proc (1 test)
rdas-bundle    = 1574.84 sec*proc (1 test)
script         = 1574.84 sec*proc (1 test)

Total Test time (real) = 1575.56 sec


The atms_n20 ioda data and the satbias files are
atms_n20.satbias.nc4 atms_n20.satbias_cov.nc4 atms_n20.tlapse.txt ioda_atms_n20.nc
Which are under:
/scratch2/NCEPDEV/fv3-cam/Xiaoyan.Zhang/noscrub/JEDI/RDASApp_1107/expr/mpas_2024052700/data/obs

@SamuelDegelia-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @xyzemc, I have the same comments for this yaml as I do for #237.

@xyzemc
Copy link
Contributor Author

xyzemc commented Nov 27, 2024

Thanks @xyzemc, I have the same comments for this yaml as I do for #237.

Just added the localization part.

obs operator:
name: CRTM
Absorbers: [H2O,O3,CO2]
Clouds: [Water, Ice]
Copy link

@HaidaoLin-NOAA HaidaoLin-NOAA Dec 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

HI Xiaoyan, did you see any differences with and without adding cloud inputs? Thanks!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

HI Xiaoyan, did you see any differences with and without adding cloud inputs? Thanks!

Yes, both the data passed QC and simulated brightness temperature are different. I will upload some figures in this PR to show these difference.

obsdataout:
engine:
type: H5File
obsfile: atms_n20_hofx.nc4
Copy link

@HaidaoLin-NOAA HaidaoLin-NOAA Dec 3, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on this recent PR: #241 from @guoqing-noaa , it would be better to rename the diag/hofx file to be something like: jdiag_atms_n20.nc4.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants