-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
On branch jm-pr-multiple-instances-of-ccpp-physics #1000
Open
michalakes
wants to merge
2
commits into
NCAR:main
Choose a base branch
from
michalakes:jm-pr-multiple-instances-of-ccpp-physics
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -54,7 +54,12 @@ subroutine read_h2odata (h2o_phys, me, master) | |
!--- h2o_pres - vertical pressure level (mb) | ||
!--- h2o_time - time coordinate (days) | ||
!--- | ||
allocate (h2o_lat(latsh2o), h2o_pres(levh2o),h2o_time(timeh2o+1)) | ||
! NOTE: If there are multiple instances of CCPP physics, only the first instance | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm surprised that this works. Only one instance is allocating space, but all instances are reading and writing to the same memory? |
||
! allocates these. All instances must use the same number of identical ozone values | ||
! jm 20230228 | ||
if ( .not.allocated(h2o_lat) ) allocate (h2o_lat(latsh2o)) | ||
if ( .not.allocated(h2o_pres)) allocate (h2o_pres(levh2o)) | ||
if ( .not.allocated(h2o_time)) allocate (h2o_time(timeh2o+1)) | ||
allocate (h2o_lat4(latsh2o), h2o_pres4(levh2o),h2o_time4(timeh2o+1)) | ||
rewind (kh2opltc) | ||
read (kh2opltc) h2o_coeff, latsh2o, levh2o, timeh2o, h2o_lat4, h2o_pres4, h2o_time4 | ||
|
@@ -69,7 +74,7 @@ subroutine read_h2odata (h2o_phys, me, master) | |
!--- assume latitudes is on a uniform gaussian grid | ||
!--- | ||
allocate (tempin(latsh2o)) | ||
allocate (h2oplin(latsh2o,levh2o,h2o_coeff,timeh2o)) | ||
if (.not.allocated(h2oplin)) allocate (h2oplin(latsh2o,levh2o,h2o_coeff,timeh2o)) | ||
DO i=1,timeh2o | ||
do n=1,h2o_coeff | ||
DO k=1,levh2o | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe another option would be to define "is_initialized" as an interstitial variable? Then each instance would have its own copy. This also keeps the instance business out of the physics schemes, but does come with the burden of adding more interstitials. Either way, changes to the schemes are needed, but we may need to discuss this more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we could leave this as is. The logic to have
is_initialized
at the scheme-module level is already there, all that this is doing is make it a vector. But if there's a good reason for doing it differently (because similar changes were made to other schemes since this PR was created years ago), then that's fine too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@climbfuji I made this change for Thompson, see https://github.com/ufs-community/ccpp-physics/blob/ufs/dev/physics/MP/Thompson/mp_thompson.F90#L57. I prefer the interstitial approach, which wouldn't be limited to an arbitrary limit on the number of instances (200).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, that's fine with me. Do we want to finish this off and make the same change for the other scheme that needs it?