TG-1 #179
Open
TG-1 #179
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added support for Velocity
Added support for being able to separate the global chat by server group to allow for multiple global chats between servers
Description
What, briefly, is the purpose of this pull request?
The purpose of this pull request is to natively support Velocity
As well as allow for Global Chat Server Grouping
Is this pull request related to an issue with the plugin?
No
What is the status of this pull request? [e.g. In Development, Undergoing Final Testing, Ready]
Ready
Changes
What currently existing parts of the plugin are affected by this pull request
Upgraded Internal components dependencies to the latest version as well as brought the project java version to 11.
What new features are added to the plugin by this pull request
Support for Velocity and Global Chat Server Grouping
Standards
Does this pull request adhere to basic Java coding standards?
Yes