Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(zk): properly mark unlinked contract #40
fix(zk): properly mark unlinked contract #40
Changes from 2 commits
bac1fff
a67a5d6
b876ee5
80196a8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to be careful now because bytecode and deployed bytecode will NOT be the same thing as bytecode might be an unlinked and
link_references
has meaningful info . Maybe update theNOTE
above.Also is having this conversion the reason why you need
missing_libraries
in theBytecode
structThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in EraVM they still are the same thing, not sure why the unlinked means it's different
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CompactBytecode
will have the link references for the bytecodeCompactDeployedBytecode
will not. Previously we only cared about the bytecode field and could use both interchangebly. It may not be the case now if we used thelinked_references
somewhere we needCompactBytecode