Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: Version conflict between scipy 1.14.1 and statsmodels 0.14.2 #139

Closed
2 tasks done
regDaniel opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #144
Closed
2 tasks done

[Bug]: Version conflict between scipy 1.14.1 and statsmodels 0.14.2 #139

regDaniel opened this issue Aug 29, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #144
Labels
CI/CD Anything related to CI/CD todo Something that devs agree should be done

Comments

@regDaniel
Copy link
Collaborator

regDaniel commented Aug 29, 2024

Is there already an issue for this?

  • I found no existing issue for this bug.

Describe the bug

See this scipy issue. For the time being, the workaround is to fix scipy to 1.14.0. We should periodically check if the incompatibility is gone with a newer version of scipy and/ or statsmodels and if that's the case, we can delete the corresponding version fixing in setup.py.

Environment

- OS:MacOSX
- Python:3.11
- ampycloud:2.0.0

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow the ampycloud Code of Conduct.
@regDaniel regDaniel added todo Something that devs agree should be done CI/CD Anything related to CI/CD labels Aug 29, 2024
@nickodell
Copy link

This issue is fixed in statsmodels==0.14.3, see statsmodels/statsmodels#9333

@regDaniel
Copy link
Collaborator Author

very cool, thanks a lot @nickodell for letting us know! I will adapt our dependencies accordingly.

@fpavogt fpavogt linked a pull request Sep 24, 2024 that will close this issue
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI/CD Anything related to CI/CD todo Something that devs agree should be done
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants