Simplified Reputation Display

Displaying Reputation and AtB Modifier was causing confusion. Especially as the AtB Modifier isn't a consistent value, with it simply being a base modifier that is further modified by the individual AtB legacy systems.

This PR removes the AtB modifier from the Reputation display.

MekHQ/src/mekhq/campaign/Campaign.java

@@ -2250,13 +2250,11 @@ private void updatePartInUseData(PartInUse partInUse, Part incomingPart,
  boolean ignoreMothballedUnits, PartQuality ignoreSparesUnderQuality) {
 
  if (ignoreMothballedUnits && (null != incomingPart.getUnit()) && incomingPart.getUnit().isMothballed()) {
- return;
  } else if ((incomingPart.getUnit() != null) || (incomingPart instanceof MissingPart)) {
  partInUse.setUseCount(partInUse.getUseCount() + getQuantity(incomingPart));
  } else {
  if (incomingPart.isPresent()) {
  if (incomingPart.getQuality().toNumeric() < ignoreSparesUnderQuality.toNumeric()) {
- return;
  } else {
  partInUse.setStoreCount(partInUse.getStoreCount() + getQuantity(incomingPart));
  partInUse.addSpare(incomingPart);
@@ -2273,7 +2271,7 @@ private void updatePartInUseData(PartInUse partInUse, Part incomingPart,
  * @param ignoreMothballedUnits don't count parts in mothballed units
  * @param ignoreSparesUnderQuality don't count spare parts lower than this quality
  */
- public void updatePartInUse(PartInUse partInUse, boolean ignoreMothballedUnits, 
+ public void updatePartInUse(PartInUse partInUse, boolean ignoreMothballedUnits,
  PartQuality ignoreSparesUnderQuality) {
  partInUse.setUseCount(0);
  partInUse.setStoreCount(0);
@@ -2290,7 +2288,7 @@ public void updatePartInUse(PartInUse partInUse, boolean ignoreMothballedUnits,
  PartInUse newPiu = getPartInUse((Part) maybePart);
  if (partInUse.equals(newPiu)) {
  partInUse.setPlannedCount(partInUse.getPlannedCount()
- + getQuantity((maybePart instanceof MissingPart) ? 
+ + getQuantity((maybePart instanceof MissingPart) ?
  ((MissingPart) maybePart).getNewPart() :
  (Part) maybePart) * maybePart.getQuantity());
  }
@@ -2334,7 +2332,7 @@ public Set<PartInUse> getPartsInUse(boolean ignoreMothballedUnits,
  inUse.put(partInUse, partInUse);
  }
  partInUse.setPlannedCount(partInUse.getPlannedCount()
- + getQuantity((maybePart instanceof MissingPart) ? 
+ + getQuantity((maybePart instanceof MissingPart) ?
  ((MissingPart) maybePart).getNewPart() :
  (Part) maybePart) * maybePart.getQuantity());
 
@@ -6950,10 +6948,7 @@ public String getUnitRatingText() {
  if (unitRatingMethod.isFMMR()) {
  return getUnitRating().getUnitRating();
  } else if (unitRatingMethod.isCampaignOperations()) {
- int reputationRating = reputation.getReputationRating();
- int unitRatingMod = getAtBUnitRatingMod();
-
- return String.format("%d (%+d)", reputationRating, unitRatingMod);
+ return String.valueOf(reputation.getReputationRating());
  } else {
  return "N/A";
  }
@@ -8002,7 +7997,7 @@ private String doMaintenanceOnUnitPart(Unit u, Part p, Map<Part, Integer> partsT
  // }
  break;
  }
- if (p.getQuality().toNumeric() > oldQuality.toNumeric()) { 
+ if (p.getQuality().toNumeric() > oldQuality.toNumeric()) {
  partReport += ": " + ReportingUtilities.messageSurroundedBySpanWithColor(
  MekHQ.getMHQOptions().getFontColorPositiveHexColor(),
  "new quality is " + p.getQualityName());