Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Connection][Storageelement][Drone]Restructure interplay to enable flexible configurations of multiple sites #6

Closed
HerrHorizontal opened this issue Oct 20, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@HerrHorizontal
Copy link
Contributor

HerrHorizontal commented Oct 20, 2020

The current treatment of one connection module to one RemoteStorage needs to be expanded to an arbitrary number of connection modules interfaced to arbitrary numbers of storage elements.

Moreover the focus on remote storage elements needs to be dismantled, since there should be no different treatment between a connection to any storage, except for parameter values.

Rather there should be distinct StorageElements which have a distinct connection and are matched to a specific site. (Also have a look into issue #7.)

@HerrHorizontal HerrHorizontal added enhancement New feature or request refactoring Restructuring for better intelligibility labels Oct 20, 2020
@HerrHorizontal
Copy link
Contributor Author

HerrHorizontal commented Oct 20, 2020

@tfesenbecker proposed to create a site module, which will include the functionalities of matching drones, storageelements and connections to a particular site.

This could also be recursively invocable to combine sites into a single one, while keeping the precise treatment of each.

@HerrHorizontal
Copy link
Contributor Author

This also involves changes as mentioned in issue #9 .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants