Use MarkerBuilder function signature to avoid collisions on functions defs #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have encountered function defs collisions when used with Flutter 3.13.
_basicMarkerBuilderdidn't conform the same signature asmarkerBuilderpassed toClusterManagerconstructor and thus makingmarkerBuildersignature to beFuture<Marker> Function(**dynamic**)instead ofFuture<Marker> Function(**Cluster<T> cluster**)which made impossible to pass own marker builder conforming the corrent signature.I found that you already made some changes in your fork of the original code, that's why I created this fix against your code. If you merge it, put it to your pull request to the origin.