You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current implementation of the double deck aircraft splits the load equally between both decks - this influences the number of rows that are needed to accommodate the max number of passengers as well as the floor sizing (since load is just split in half between the floors currently) as well.
We could improve this by appropriately reducing the number of seats (and therefore load) based on the location of the floors relative to the fuselage centerline.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Current implementation of the double deck aircraft splits the load equally between both decks - this influences the number of rows that are needed to accommodate the max number of passengers as well as the floor sizing (since load is just split in half between the floors currently) as well.
We could improve this by appropriately reducing the number of seats (and therefore load) based on the location of the floors relative to the fuselage centerline.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: