Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create snyk-security.yml #10

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2023
Merged

Create snyk-security.yml #10

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2023

Conversation

davidmerwin
Copy link
Member

@davidmerwin davidmerwin commented Dec 29, 2023

Type

Enhancement


Description

This PR introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for running security checks using Snyk. The main changes include:

  • A new workflow file .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml was added.
  • The workflow is triggered on push and pull request events on the "main" and "Map" branches.
  • The workflow sets up the Snyk CLI and runs several security analyses (Snyk Code, Snyk Open Source, Snyk Infrastructure as Code, and Snyk Container).
  • The results of the Snyk Code analysis are uploaded to GitHub Security Code Scanning.

PR changes walkthrough

Relevant files                                                                                                                                 
Configuration changes
1 files
snyk-security.yml                                                                                     
    .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml

    The file .github/workflows/snyk-security.yml was added. It
    contains a new GitHub Actions workflow named "Snyk Security"
    which is triggered on push and pull request events on the
    "main" and "Map" branches. The workflow sets up the Snyk CLI
    to check for security issues, runs Snyk Code (SAST)
    analysis, Snyk Open Source (SCA) analysis, Snyk
    Infrastructure as Code (IaC) analysis, and Snyk Container
    (Container and SCA) analysis. The results of the Snyk Code
    analysis are then uploaded to GitHub Security Code Scanning.

+79/-0

User description

#5 (comment) @carrietian099 @LangMers/langmers-systems

Signed-off-by: David Jeffrey Merwin <[email protected]>
Copy link

Hi there! 👋 Thanks for opening a PR. 🎉 To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization LangMers. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. 🚀

Copy link

quine-bot bot commented Dec 29, 2023

👋 Figuring out if a PR is useful is hard, hopefully this will help.

  • @davidmerwin has been on GitHub since 2019 and in that time has had 4 public PRs merged
  • Don't you recognize them? They've been here before 🎉
  • Here's a good example of their work: LangMersSystems (Say it. Learn it. Live it.)
  • From looking at their profile, they seem to be good with Makefile and Python.

Their most recently public accepted PR is: davidmerwin1992/upgraded-journey#1

@the-label-bot the-label-bot bot added kind/feature kind/feature size/M size/M labels Dec 29, 2023
Copy link

the-label-bot bot commented Dec 29, 2023

The Label Bot has predicted the following:

Category Value Confidence Applied Label
Kind feature 0.921 ✔️
Kind M 0.984 ✔️

@qodo-merge-pro qodo-merge-pro bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 29, 2023
Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (a4588fe)

1 similar comment
Copy link

PR Description updated to latest commit (a4588fe)

Copy link

qodo-merge-pro bot commented Dec 29, 2023

PR Analysis

(review updated until commit a4588fe)

  • 🎯 Main theme: Adding Snyk Security GitHub Actions workflow
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow for running security checks using Snyk. The workflow is triggered on push and pull request events on the "main" and "Map" branches. It sets up the Snyk CLI and runs several security analyses, with the results of the Snyk Code analysis being uploaded to GitHub Security Code Scanning.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, because the PR is straightforward and involves adding a new GitHub Actions workflow file. However, it requires knowledge of Snyk and GitHub Actions to review effectively.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the addition of a Snyk security workflow is a good practice for maintaining code security. However, it would be beneficial to ensure that the Snyk API token is securely stored and not exposed in any logs or error messages.

🤖 Code feedback:
relevant file.github/workflows/snyk-security.yml
suggestion      

Consider adding error handling or a fallback mechanism in case the Snyk CLI setup or any of the security analyses fail. This will ensure that the workflow doesn't break unexpectedly. [important]

relevant lineuses: snyk/actions/setup@806182742461562b67788a64410098c9d9b96adb

relevant file.github/workflows/snyk-security.yml
suggestion      

It's a good practice to pin actions to a specific version. Using the commit hash to pin the action is highly secure, but it doesn't provide context on what version is being used. Consider using a version tag if available. [medium]

relevant lineuses: snyk/actions/setup@806182742461562b67788a64410098c9d9b96adb

✨ Usage tips:

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To edit any configuration parameter from the configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value.
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

Copy link

Persistent review updated to latest commit a4588fe

@davidmerwin davidmerwin merged commit 3c56c02 into main Dec 29, 2023
6 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Configuration changes enhancement New feature or request kind/feature kind/feature size/M size/M
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants