Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(dbless): nest unique field errors for child entities #14017

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

flrgh
Copy link
Contributor

@flrgh flrgh commented Dec 13, 2024

Summary

This applies the same fix as b8891eb (#12797) but to a different code path that checks fields with a unique constraint.

Checklist

  • The Pull Request has tests
  • A changelog file has been created
  • There is a user-facing docs PR

Issue reference

closes #13998

see also:

FTI-6351
FTI-6318
KAG-6032

This applies the same fix as b8891eb
but to a different code path that checks fields with a unique constraint.
@github-actions github-actions bot added core/db schema-change-noteworthy cherry-pick kong-ee schedule this PR for cherry-picking to kong/kong-ee labels Dec 13, 2024
@flrgh flrgh requested review from lhanjian and outsinre December 13, 2024 04:05
@flrgh flrgh merged commit 9dded31 into master Dec 16, 2024
34 checks passed
@flrgh flrgh deleted the fix/declarative-flatten-nested-entity-errs branch December 16, 2024 17:51
@team-gateway-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Successfully created cherry-pick PR for master:

lhanjian pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
…0999)

* fix(dbless): nest unique field errors for child entities

This applies the same fix as b8891eb
but to a different code path that checks fields with a unique constraint.

* improve docstring

(cherry picked from commit 9dded31)

Co-authored-by: Michael Martin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick kong-ee schedule this PR for cherry-picking to kong/kong-ee core/db schema-change-noteworthy size/L
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants