Relay: Add Panasonic AD11 Form A

[antoniovazquezblanco]

SYM PR: KiCad/kicad-symbols#1915
FP PR: #1638
3D PR: KiCad/kicad-packages3D#572
3D SOURCE PR: easyw/kicad-3d-models-in-freecad#289
KLC NAMING: KiCad/kicad-website#418

https://www.panasonic-electric-works.com/pew/es/downloads/ds_dw_hl_en.pdf

---

All contributions to the kicad library must follow the KiCad library convention

Thanks for creating a pull request to contribute to the KiCad libraries! To speed up integration of your PR, please check the following items:

• Provide a URL to a datasheet for the footprint(s) you are contributing
• An example screenshot image is very helpful
• If there are matching symbol or 3D model pull requests, provide link(s) as appropriate
• Check the output of the Travis automated check scripts - fix any errors as required
• Give a reason behind any intentional library convention rule violation.

[evanshultz]

1. Can the description include some basic dimensions?
2. Can you put pin 1 in the top left corner and unrotate all pads, if needed?
3. Can you point me to the discussion about relay footprint naming? It's not in KLC but I feel like there was a discussion, only I can't find it now.

Once that's done I'll review. Due to the rotation I don't want to dimension twice.

[antoniovazquezblanco]

Can you point me to the discussion about relay footprint naming? It's not in KLC but I feel like there was a discussion, only I can't find it now.

It is about switches. I would go with the same naming scheme: KiCad/kicad-symbols#580

[antoniovazquezblanco]

TODO: Reopen 3D PR

[evanshultz]

1. One thing I don't like about this naming scheme is that it separates members of the same family. For example, if a family have 1FormA and 1FormC members they're potentially spaced apart. Not sure if it's a problem or anybody else feels the same way, but I want to mention it for discussion purposes. Naturally it doesn't apply here so I'll move discussion to the main issue, but rather than start a paradigm that we abandon I'd rather ask before merging and see if there is quick feedback.
2. Can you unrotate pad 5?
3. All dimensions look good to me:
   

[antoniovazquezblanco]

Fixed issues and opened a report to reach an agreement on relay notation.

Thank you very much @evanshultz!

[evanshultz]

Oops. I forgot to start the naming discussion. Thanks for stepping in.

If you don't mind, let's allow that to percolate for a bit before merging.

[antoniovazquezblanco]

If you don't mind, let's allow that to percolate for a bit before merging.

Totally agree!

[antoniovazquezblanco]

@evanshultz Has naming evolved enough? Can we agree on this or is it still not ready enought?

Thanks!

[antoniovazquezblanco]

@evanshultz what do you think about naming? It seems #1728 has been merged with the current naming convention. Do we agree on moving fordward?

Thanks!

[evanshultz]

@antoniovazquezblanco
I'm OK with it. Seems like the conversation died off a bit in the thread but the main points are here. Other items can be cleaned up library-wide if and when that happens.

One thing, which oddly CI didn't catch: the 3D model doesn't match the footprint name. Shouldn't it?

[antoniovazquezblanco]

Updated 3D model path!

Updated 3D PR KiCad/kicad-packages3D#663

Thanks!

[evanshultz]

Thanks!!

[antoniovazquezblanco]

Thank you!