-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 375
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(tests/e2e-evm): Restructure ABI tests for extensibility & reduce duplication #2031
base: nd-implement-basic-precompile-calling
Are you sure you want to change the base?
refactor(tests/e2e-evm): Restructure ABI tests for extensibility & reduce duplication #2031
Conversation
Fallback tests are not run on each function but rather only for the specific fallback. This means whether or not to run the test is determined by only the receive and fallback functions, without any other ABI function.
Previously used type assertions to bypass certain TypeScript issues with test cases, along with using any & unsafe assignments. This resolves the types to be properly valid and enforced to prevent any potential errors.
Changes from including a field in each test case from conditionally running the case, to building the cases dynamically. This allows for logical grouping of test cases and organization with logic instead of using comments. Slightly less explicit for each test case, but with the grouping of test cases, it reduces the mental overhead of figuring out when each test case is run.
Resolves use type casting and unsafe access, validation of revert errors for matches and types
Previously runs all the time, which is currently okay with the current single testing contract that includes both functions. This conditionally adds these test cases if the respective functions exist so we can test additional contract behavior that may not have these functions and may produce a different error.
Most of these issues are intentional and are okay to ignore. This also sets the solhint ignoreConstructors option to true for the func-visibility rule, as we are using solidity >=0.7.0
"extends": "solhint:recommended" | ||
"extends": "solhint:recommended", | ||
"rules": { | ||
"func-visibility": ["warn", { "ignoreConstructors": true }] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tyty I did not know about this configuration
Long errors are truncated and difficult to determine the issue otherwise
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ import "hardhat-ignore-warnings"; | |||
// Chai setup | |||
// | |||
chai.use(chaiAsPromised); | |||
chai.config.truncateThreshold = 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❤️ Idk why I didn't find this setting, so much nicer without any truncation
const expectedMatch = /call not allowed to disabled contract/; | ||
expect(expectedMatch.test(revertDetail), `expected ${revertDetail} to match ${expectedMatch}`).to.be.true; | ||
const expectedMatch = "call not allowed to disabled contract"; | ||
expect(revertDetail).to.equal(revertDetail, `expected ${revertDetail} to match ${expectedMatch}`); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice simplification -- we may have to change it back at some point though, but let's keep for now.
The error response of viem for hardhat, kvtool, etc can be a bit different so I meant to only match the revert message here. Unfortunately, chai doesn't have a great matcher for regex like testify.
mockAddress = (await hre.viem.deployContract(mockContractName)).address; | ||
|
||
const mockArtifact = await hre.artifacts.readArtifact(mockContractName); | ||
if (isHex(mockArtifact.deployedBytecode)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great type guard
@@ -52,7 +59,7 @@ contract Caller { | |||
// High level caller | |||
// | |||
contract NoopCaller { | |||
NoopNoReceiveNoFallback target; | |||
NoopNoReceiveNoFallback private target; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice reduction in scope 👍
Description