Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WILL NOT BE MERGED] Kava cosmos v50 test patched #81

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

boodyvo
Copy link

@boodyvo boodyvo commented Oct 10, 2024

Test update for cosmos-sdk v0.50.10

@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ the Tracer type used to collect execution traces from the EVM transaction execut

* (proto) [tharsis#448](https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/pull/448) Bump version for all Ethermint messages to `v1`
* (server) [tharsis#434](https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/pull/434) `evm-rpc` flags and app config have been renamed to `json-rpc`.
* (proto, evm) [tharsis#207](https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/issues/207) Replace `big.Int` in favor of `sdk.Int` for `TxData` fields
* (proto, evm) [tharsis#207](https://github.com/evmos/ethermint/issues/207) Replace `big.Int` in favor of `sdkmath.Int` for `TxData` fields
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't be changed

@@ -16,10 +16,11 @@
package ante

import (
sdkstore "cosmossdk.io/store/types"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: should consider using storetypes "cosmossdk.io/store/types" since that seems to be the standard in the cosmos sdk.

@@ -233,7 +237,7 @@ func VerifySignature(
Gas: tx.GetGas(),
},
msgs, tx.GetMemo(),
tx.GetTip(),
// tx.TipTx interface was removed, added types.TxWithTimeoutHeight, they have been deprecated and should not be used since v0.46.0
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This relates to our eip712 signature validation so will need a more thorough review to ensure nothing breaks. On first look, I don't think is will break eip712 but we should definitely note to test this more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants