Update requirements for JuMP 0.20 and StructJuMP#master #25
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The representation we need to communicate with MPB: is not provided by StructJuMP anymore. Here the tests are passing because we don't any any solver so the tests are skipped. |
|
Did you mean to merge this? JuMP 0.20 can't work with MathProgBase? |
|
The master branch of this package is for using the package with MOI/JuMP. This PR made a first step in that direction so I merged. The migration to MOI is mandatory indeed, #26 aims to continue the transition. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here's a tentative pull request to make StructDualDynProg pass all tests and work with recent JuMP+StructJuMP. Still using MathProgBase however.
Removed GLPK from solver testing to pass tests while waiting to use MOI.