Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LinearAlgebra: Don't assume AbstractVector supports deleteat! #46672

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 12, 2022

Conversation

eschnett
Copy link
Contributor

@eschnett eschnett commented Sep 7, 2022

Closes #46654.

@udohjeremiah udohjeremiah added the linear algebra Linear algebra label Sep 8, 2022
@eschnett
Copy link
Contributor Author

eschnett commented Sep 9, 2022

The CI errors appear unrelated.

@dkarrasch
Copy link
Member

Can we have a simple test to guard against regression? I think ranges should make up for good diagonal types that don't support deleteat!, though they will likely be turned into Vectors upon calling _pushzero... not sure.

@Tokazama
Copy link
Contributor

Tokazama commented Sep 9, 2022

This sort of thing is the motivation for #46500

@dkarrasch dkarrasch merged commit 9e8fb63 into JuliaLang:master Sep 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
linear algebra Linear algebra
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

kron of Diagonal and Bidiagonal calls missing method
4 participants