-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Annotate intertrack edges in the ctc get_edge_errors
function
#54
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
54a99f2
Annotate intertrack edges in ctc edge errors function
msschwartz21 2b2d005
CTC loader does not need to annotated intertrack edges
msschwartz21 ba74e99
Check for node error annotations before calculating edge errors
msschwartz21 d531bce
Update tests
msschwartz21 ae4159d
Remove annotation of true positive edges since its somewhat subjective
msschwartz21 59d25ca
Merge branch 'main' into intertrack_edges
msschwartz21 404caf2
style(pre-commit.ci): auto fixes [...]
pre-commit-ci[bot] a3968e6
Add merge detection to tracking graph and assign intertrack edges for…
msschwartz21 31c9f86
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/intertrack_edges' into intertrac…
msschwartz21 9b852a5
Merge branch 'main' into intertrack_edges
msschwartz21 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@msschwartz21 I don't think I fully understand why we are not annotating true positive edges? You mention in the description that we can't rely on the assumption that
TP
andWS
edges are mutually exclusive, but I think we can? I don't think aTP
edge should ever be annotated withWS
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My stab at explaining this, that Morgan can elaborate on at her leisure: I admit that I am always confused by
WS
edges; however, it is my understanding that if there is a division and we correctly detect one of the edges to a daughter but not the other, the one we correctly detected would be labeledWS
- correct? I would consider that aTP
- we correctly identified the edge! Just because we missed the other daughter edge (aFN
edge), that doesn't make the correctly recovered edge incorrect. In that way, something that is aWS
edge in the CTC metric could be considered aTP
elsewhere, making them not mutually exclusive.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
^ Caroline's description captures my thoughts perfectly