Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nipype firstlvl #15

Open
wants to merge 39 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

mselimata
Copy link
Collaborator

@mselimata mselimata commented May 8, 2024

A reproduction of SPM tutorial fMRI 1st level analysis using nipype"

@mselimata mselimata self-assigned this May 8, 2024
@mselimata mselimata requested a review from cmaumet May 8, 2024 20:32
@mselimata mselimata added the enhancement New feature or request label May 15, 2024
@mselimata mselimata removed the request for review from cmaumet May 23, 2024 08:48
@mselimata
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mselimata commented May 27, 2024

Currently first lvl analysis settings are the exact same as SPM but Nipype is producing 8 beta files, instead of 2
Fixed it, now all the outputs are as expected.

@mselimata mselimata requested a review from cmaumet May 28, 2024 16:04
@mselimata
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mselimata commented May 28, 2024

Currently nipype first lvl behaves in the same way of SPM.
To check if its reproducible, I need to fix my python code that I broke with some extra edits, this morning.
Python code of comparisons updated.
[TODO] Run spm code to have a comparison.

@mselimata
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mselimata commented Jul 12, 2024

  • Nipype & SPM have same contrast file
    But why shasums of estimations different?
    & Why all nipype settings produce same results?
  • Figure it out...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant