🎨 notice响应期添加rule #1682
🎨 notice响应期添加rule #1682
Conversation
审核指南由 Sourcery 提供此拉取请求在 Zhenxun 机器人框架中实现了一个新规则，用于处理通知事件。它引入了一个 notice_rule 函数使用的序列图sequenceDiagram
actor User
participant Plugin as Plugin
participant Rule as notice_rule
participant Event
User ->> Plugin: 触发事件
Plugin ->> Rule: 调用 notice_rule(event_type)
Rule ->> Event: 检查事件类型
alt 事件匹配
Rule -->> Plugin: 返回 True
else 事件不匹配
Rule -->> Plugin: 返回 False
end
zhenxun/utils/rules.py 中更新规则的类图classDiagram
class Rule {
+_rule(event: Event) bool
}
class Event
class notice_rule {
+notice_rule(event_type: type | list[type]) Rule
}
notice_rule --> Rule
notice_rule --> Event
文件级更改
提示和命令与 Sourcery 互动
自定义您的体验访问您的仪表板以：
获取帮助Original review guide in EnglishReviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request implements a new rule for handling notice events in the Zhenxun bot framework. It introduces a Sequence diagram for notice_rule function usagesequenceDiagram
actor User
participant Plugin as Plugin
participant Rule as notice_rule
participant Event
User ->> Plugin: Trigger event
Plugin ->> Rule: Call notice_rule(event_type)
Rule ->> Event: Check event type
alt Event matches
Rule -->> Plugin: Return True
else Event does not match
Rule -->> Plugin: Return False
end
Class diagram for the updated rules in zhenxun/utils/rules.pyclassDiagram
class Rule {
+_rule(event: Event) bool
}
class Event
class notice_rule {
+notice_rule(event_type: type | list[type]) Rule
}
notice_rule --> Rule
notice_rule --> Event
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
嗨 @HibiKier - 我已经审查了你的更改 - 这里有一些反馈：
总体评论：
- 考虑在
notice_rule函数中使用集合而不是列表，以便在提供多个事件类型时进行更快的查找。 notice_rule函数是一个很好的抽象，但要确保它不会引入显著的开销，特别是对于频繁触发的事件。
这是我在审查期间查看的内容
- 🟡 一般问题：发现2个问题
- 🟢 安全性：一切看起来都很好
- 🟢 测试：一切看起来都很好
- 🟡 复杂性：发现1个问题
- 🟢 文档：一切看起来都很好
帮助我变得更有用！请点击每条评论上的 👍 或 👎，我将使用反馈来改进你的评论。
Original comment in English
Hey @HibiKier - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider using a set instead of a list in the
notice_rulefunction for faster lookups when multiple event types are provided. - The
notice_rulefunction is a good abstraction, but ensure it doesn't introduce significant overhead, especially for frequently triggered events.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 2 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟡 Complexity: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
| @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ async def _rule(bot: Bot, event: Event, session: EventSession) -> bool: | |||
| return True | |||
| if session.id1 and session.id2: | |||
| level = a | |||
| if type(a) == str and key: | |||
| if isinstance(a, str) and key: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (performance): 考虑优化 notice_rule 函数以便提前返回
在 notice_rule 函数中，当 event_type 是一个列表时，你可以在找到匹配项后立即返回 True，而不是继续遍历整个列表。对于较长的事件类型列表，这将更高效。
Original comment in English
suggestion (performance): Consider optimizing the notice_rule function for early return
In the notice_rule function, when event_type is a list, you could return True immediately upon finding a match instead of continuing to iterate through the entire list. This would be more efficient for longer lists of event types.
| group_decrease_handle = on_notice( | ||
| priority=1, | ||
| block=False, | ||
| rule=notice_rule([GroupMemberDecreaseEvent, GroupMemberIncreaseEvent]), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (bug_risk): 修正 group_decrease_handle 的事件类型
group_decrease_handle 使用的是 GroupMemberIncreaseEvent 而不是 GroupDecreaseNoticeEvent。这似乎是一个复制粘贴错误，可能导致意外行为。请验证并更正事件类型。
Original comment in English
issue (bug_risk): Correct event type for group_decrease_handle
The group_decrease_handle is using GroupMemberIncreaseEvent instead of GroupDecreaseNoticeEvent. This appears to be a copy-paste error and could lead to unexpected behavior. Please verify and correct the event types.
| @@ -59,3 +59,26 @@ def ensure_private(session: EventSession) -> bool: | |||
| bool: bool | |||
| """ | |||
| return not session.id3 and not session.id2 | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| def notice_rule(event_type: type | list[type]) -> Rule: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (complexity): 考虑重构 notice_rule 函数以简化其实现并提高效率。
notice_rule 函数可以简化以减少复杂性，同时保持清晰。以下是一个建议的重构：
def notice_rule(event_types: type | tuple[type, ...]) -> Rule:
if not isinstance(event_types, tuple):
event_types = (event_types,)
def _rule(event: Event) -> bool:
return isinstance(event, event_types)
return Rule(_rule)此重构解决了几个问题：
- 它使用元组而不是列表来确保
event_types的不变性。 - 它通过利用
isinstance可以接受类型元组来简化类型检查。 - 它移除了嵌套的 if-else 结构，简化了逻辑。
- 它消除了显式迭代的需要，使代码更简洁。
此实现更简单、更高效且更易于理解，同时保持了原有功能。使用带有类型元组的 isinstance 是一种 Pythonic 的方式来检查多种类型，这既清晰又高效。
Original comment in English
issue (complexity): Consider refactoring the notice_rule function to simplify its implementation and improve efficiency.
The notice_rule function can be simplified to reduce complexity while maintaining clarity. Here's a suggested refactoring:
def notice_rule(event_types: type | tuple[type, ...]) -> Rule:
if not isinstance(event_types, tuple):
event_types = (event_types,)
def _rule(event: Event) -> bool:
return isinstance(event, event_types)
return Rule(_rule)This refactoring addresses several issues:
- It uses a tuple instead of a list for
event_types, ensuring immutability. - It simplifies the type checking by leveraging the fact that
isinstancecan accept a tuple of types. - It removes the nested if-else structure, flattening the logic.
- It eliminates the need for explicit iteration, making the code more concise.
This implementation is simpler, more efficient, and easier to understand while maintaining the original functionality. The use of isinstance with a tuple of types is a Pythonic way to check against multiple types, which is both clear and performant.
Sourcery总结
添加一个新的
notice_rule函数来管理通知事件的事件类型限制，并更新各种通知处理程序以利用此新规则以提高事件处理的灵活性。重构规则中的类型检查以使用isinstance，以提高可读性和性能。新功能：
notice_rule函数来处理通知事件的事件类型限制。增强功能：
zhenxun/utils/rules.py中的规则检查以使用isinstance进行类型检查。admin_notice和其他通知处理程序以使用新的notice_rule，以实现更灵活的事件类型处理。Original summary in English
Summary by Sourcery
Add a new
notice_rulefunction to manage event type restrictions for notice events, and update various notice handlers to utilize this new rule for improved event handling flexibility. Refactor type checking in rules to useisinstancefor better readability and performance.New Features:
notice_rulefunction to handle event type restrictions for notice events.Enhancements:
zhenxun/utils/rules.pyto useisinstancefor type checking.admin_noticeand other notice handlers to use the newnotice_rulefor more flexible event type handling.