feat: Removed dependency on Foundation #22
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bradhowes
changed the title
bradhowes
force-pushed
the
remove-foundation
branch
from
4b1e345
to
eab1975
Compare
|
Ping @dimlio |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Addresses issue #13
Removes Foundation dependency by replacing with Darwin (macOS) or Glibc (Linux), and providing a custom
String(format:...)constructor with one that is based onvsnprintf.Originally used
vasprintfper example code found in Apple doc, but Swift does not find this function in glibc.How Has This Been Tested?
All existing tests pass, including
testOutputPercentileDistributionPlainTextwhich exercises the replacement function.Minimal checklist:
DocCcode-level documentation for any public interfaces exported by the package