Update README.md #7
Conversation
|
Review changes with |
👋 Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
Please double check the following review of the pull request:Issues counts
Changes in the diff
Identified Issues
No issues were identified in the proposed changes. Missing Tests for Incoming ChangesSince the changes are related to documentation (README.md), no additional tests are necessary. The changes involve reordering sections and improving the contribution instructions, which do not affect the codebase or functionality. Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
Feedback:
Consider revising the changes made to |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThe PR reorganizes sections in the README.md file and expands the contribution guidelines with more detailed steps for contributors. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 13 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior.
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency.
|
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! Scan results: |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please clean up the PR description by removing the template placeholders and note about writing the description. Add a brief description of your changes to the README.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
gstraccini
bot
added
the
☑️ auto-merge
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)
67-67: Consider maintaining the original section orderThe conventional structure for README files typically places the Contribution section before the License section. This organization:
- Groups actionable information (how to contribute) with the main content
- Places legal information (license) at the end
- Follows common README patterns found in popular repositories
-## Contribution +## License Contributions are welcome! If you'd like to enhance this repository, feel free to: - Fork the repository. - Create a new branch for your feature or bug fix. - Submit a pull request with a detailed description. -## License +## Contribution This project is licensed under the [MIT License](LICENSE).Also applies to: 76-76
69-72: Improve Markdown formattingAdd blank lines around the list items to improve readability and follow Markdown best practices.
Contributions are welcome! If you'd like to enhance this repository, feel free to: + - Fork the repository. - Create a new branch for your feature or bug fix. - Submit a pull request with a detailed description. +🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~69-~69: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 6 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2229 characters long)
Context: ... Contribution Contributions are welcome! If you'd like to enhance this repositor...(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[notice] 70-70: README.md#L70
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[style] ~69-~69: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 6 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2229 characters long)
Context: ... Contribution Contributions are welcome! If you'd like to enhance this repositor...
(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
README.md
[notice] 70-70: README.md#L70
Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
|
@gstraccini create labels |
|
Creating 26 labels and updating 6 labels! 🏷️ |
Closes #
📑 Description
✅ Checks
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
ℹ Additional Information
Note
I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.
Summary by Sourcery
Documentation:
Summary by CodeRabbit