Feature/fix build

[guibranco]

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

Summary by Sourcery

Refactor the codebase to use asynchronous programming with async/await for RabbitMQ operations, enhancing performance and scalability. Update GitHub Actions workflows to include concurrency control and add new CI workflows for CodeQL and Deep Source analysis.

New Features:

• Introduce asynchronous programming model across various components using async/await.

Enhancements:

• Refactor existing synchronous RabbitMQ client operations to asynchronous operations for improved performance and scalability.

Build:

• Add concurrency control to GitHub Actions workflows to prevent overlapping runs.

CI:

• Add CodeQL analysis workflow for security and quality checks.
• Add Deep Source workflow for test coverage and code analysis.

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Update the project to use asynchronous RabbitMQ channel operations and introduce new configuration files for build management, code quality checks, and coding conventions.

Why are these changes being made?

These changes enhance the existing RabbitMQ messaging with asynchronous operations for improved performance and reliability. New configuration files for tools like DeepSource, GitHub Actions, and .editorconfig are added to standardize coding styles, automate builds, and improve code quality through continuous integration analytics. This ensures best practices are followed and makes the system more robust and easier to maintain.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Introduced a new workflow for automating build processes and testing in .NET projects.
  • Added workflows for CodeQL analysis and DeepSource coverage reporting.
  • Implemented a script for automatic commit message generation.

• Bug Fixes

  • Updated branch name validation in pre-commit hook to include new prefixes.

• Documentation

  • Updated copyright year in the MIT License.

• Chores

  • Added configuration files for code analysis and formatting standards.
  • Created .gitattributes for Git file handling configurations.

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

Changed Files

File	Status
.config/dotnet-tools.json	67% smaller
Src/Worker/Worker.cs	2% smaller
.csharpierrc.yaml	Unsupported file format
.deepsource.toml	Unsupported file format
.editorconfig	Unsupported file format
.gitattributes	Unsupported file format
.githooks/pre-commit	Unsupported file format
.githooks/prepare-commit-msg	Unsupported file format
.github/workflows/build.yml	Unsupported file format
.github/workflows/codeql.yml	Unsupported file format
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml	Unsupported file format
.github/workflows/linter.yml	Unsupported file format
.wakatime-project	Unsupported file format
GitVersion.yml	Unsupported file format
LICENSE	Unsupported file format
Src/Send/Send.cs	0% smaller

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR modernizes the codebase by converting synchronous RabbitMQ operations to their asynchronous counterparts and updates the project infrastructure. The changes include converting all RabbitMQ client operations to use async/await patterns, updating GitHub workflows, and adding new configuration files for various tools.

Sequence diagram for asynchronous RabbitMQ operations

sequenceDiagram
    participant Main
    participant ConnectionFactory
    participant Connection
    participant Channel
    participant Consumer

    Main->>ConnectionFactory: CreateConnectionAsync()
    ConnectionFactory-->>Main: Connection
    Main->>Connection: CreateChannelAsync()
    Connection-->>Main: Channel
    Main->>Channel: QueueDeclareAsync()
    Main->>Channel: BasicQosAsync()
    Main->>Consumer: AsyncEventingBasicConsumer(Channel)
    Consumer->>Channel: BasicConsumeAsync()
    Consumer->>Channel: BasicAckAsync()

Loading

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Convert RabbitMQ client operations from synchronous to asynchronous	Replace synchronous connection and channel creation with async versions Convert queue and exchange operations to their async equivalents Update consumer event handlers to use async patterns Convert message publishing operations to async Replace Thread.Sleep with Task.Delay for better async practices	Src/WorkerAck/WorkerAck.cs Src/Worker/Worker.cs Src/RpcClient/Program.cs Src/RpcWorker/Program.cs Src/Receive/Receive.cs Src/ReceiveLogs/ReceiveLogs.cs Src/EmitLog/EmitLog.cs Src/NewTaskAck/NewTaskAck.cs Src/Send/Send.cs Src/NewTask/NewTask.cs
Add and update CI/CD infrastructure	Add CodeQL security analysis workflow Add build workflow with .NET 9.0 support Add DeepSource analysis configuration Update linter workflow with concurrency controls Add GitVersion configuration for version management	.github/workflows/codeql.yml .github/workflows/build.yml .github/workflows/deep-source.yml .github/workflows/linter.yml .deepsource.toml GitVersion.yml
Update development tooling configuration	Pin CSharpier version with rollForward configuration Add new configuration files for various development tools Update end of line handling in CSharpier configuration	.config/dotnet-tools.json .csharpierrc.yaml .editorconfig .gitattributes .githooks/prepare-commit-msg .vscode/settings.json .wakatime-project

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[korbit-ai]

Korbit doesn't automatically review large (500+ lines changed) pull requests such as this one. If you want me to review anyway, use /korbit-review.

[pr-code-reviewer]

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].}}

[instapr]

Feedback on Pull Request

• Description: Please limit the changes to only one type (docs, feature, etc.) and keep the pull request small.
• Checks:
  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed
• Breaking Change:
  • Yes
  • No

Changes Proposed

• Fixed build errors in EmitLog.cs, NewTask.cs, NewTaskAck.cs, among others.
• Updated .editorconfig, .gitattributes, .githooks/pre-commit.
• Added build configurations and new files (GitVersion.yml, .wakatime-project, etc.).

Additional Info

Any additional breaking changes, dependency updates, or new configurations should be noted.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several configuration files and modifications to enhance the project's structure and coding standards. Key changes include the addition of .editorconfig, .gitattributes, .deepsource.toml, and various GitHub Actions workflows for CI/CD processes. It also updates existing files with new properties for tools like csharpier and modifies the handling of messages in the Worker class for improved asynchronous processing. Additionally, the copyright year in the LICENSE file is updated, and minor variable declaration changes are made in the code.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.config/dotnet-tools.json	Added property "rollForward": false to csharpier tool configuration.
.csharpierrc.yaml	Added a newline character at the end of the file.
.deepsource.toml	New configuration file created with analyzers for DeepSource.
.editorconfig	New file created to establish coding conventions for C#.
.gitattributes	New file created to configure Git's handling of files.
.githooks/pre-commit	Updated valid_branch_regex to include penify and gitauto prefixes.
.githooks/prepare-commit-msg	New script added to automate commit message generation using dotnet-aicommitmessage.
.github/workflows/build.yml	New workflow added to automate the build process for a .NET project.
.github/workflows/codeql.yml	New workflow added for automating CodeQL analysis.
.github/workflows/deep-source.yml	New workflow added for generating coverage reports using DeepSource.
.github/workflows/linter.yml	Added concurrency configuration and corrected casing in the CSharpier format check step.
.wakatime-project	Added line "Hello World RabbitMQ .NET".
GitVersion.yml	Added various configurations for versioning strategy and format.
LICENSE	Updated copyright year from 2019 to 2024.
Src/Send/Send.cs	Changed variable declaration from string to var for type inference.
Src/Worker/Worker.cs	Updated event handler to be asynchronous and replaced Thread.Sleep with await Task.Delay.

Possibly related PRs

• Add C# code formatting configuration file #32: The main PR introduces a new property in the csharpier tool configuration, while this retrieved PR adds a new configuration file for handling end-of-line characters in C# projects, which is relevant to code formatting practices.

Suggested labels

enhancement, size/XS, korbit-code-analysis, Review effort [1-5]: 1

Poem

🐇 In the land of code, we hop and play,
With tools and configs, we pave the way.
A newline here, a hook over there,
Our RabbitMQ dances without a care!
With builds and tests, we’ll never stray,
Hooray for changes, hip-hip-hooray! 🎉

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codara-ai-code-review]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior.

1. /.github/workflows/codeql.yml - The cron schedule defined ('36 2 * * 2') may not be suitable for all repositories or teams. Ensure that this schedule aligns with the intended frequency of analysis to avoid missing critical scans.

2. /Src/RpcWorker/Program.cs - The await keyword is used with the Consumer method, which is a good practice; however, SendReplyMessage inside the Consumer method also has the potential for asynchronous behavior, and it’s unclear if it should be awaited. If it returns a Task, not awaiting it could lead to unhandled exceptions or lost data.

3. /Src/Receive/Receive.cs - In the consumer.ReceivedAsync callback, the failure to correctly handle the return of Task.CompletedTask (via async Task syntax) can lead to missed exception handling if any processing fails. This could lead to unobserved task exceptions.

4. /Src/Worker/Worker.cs - Similar to the above, the use of Console.ReadLine() to pause execution can lead to issues in CI/CD environments where no user input is possible. Often, this would be better managed with a cancellation token or another exit strategy.

5. /Src/Send/Send.cs - There is no handling of potential exceptions that may occur during the message publishing process. If BasicPublishAsync fails, it is not caught, which could result in loss of important data or an application crash.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency (without impeding code quality).

1. /.config/dotnet-tools.json - Consider adding comments for the "rollForward" property to clarify its purpose and implications for future maintainers.

2. /Src/RpcClient/Program.cs - When using the await keyword, ensure that all asynchronous method calls, including Consumer and Publisher, are properly awaited or handled to prevent firewall-related issues or unhandled exceptions. Align with the code style used in RpcWorker.

3. /Src/ReceiveLogs/ReceiveLogs.cs - Instead of using Console.WriteLine directly, consider implementing structured logging. This improves log management and allows for better analysis and monitoring, especially in production environments.

4. /Src/WorkerAck/WorkerAck.cs - The Thread.Sleep(dots * 1000); should be replaced with await Task.Delay(dots * 1000); to ensure the method remains asynchronous and doesn't block the thread.

5. /Src/NewTask/NewTask.cs - The output message when an error occurs during message publishing should be logged using a logging framework rather than simply using Console.WriteLine. This will enhance monitoring and tracking in production scenarios.

6. /.editorconfig - It is good to see comprehensive coding standards defined; ensure that all team members are aligned to the configurations to prevent inconsistencies.

7. /LICENSE - Update the year in the license file to reflect proper copyright information, ensuring legal accuracy and clarity regarding ownership.

8. Docker settings - While docker is mentioned within .deepsource.toml, consider adding a dedicated Docker configuration file for better consistency and standardization across the application.

[gooroo-dev]

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	1	2	0

Changes in the diff

• ➕ Added .deepsource.toml configuration file for DeepSource analysis.
• ➕ Added GitHub Actions workflows for build, CodeQL analysis, and DeepSource.
• ➕ Introduced asynchronous programming using async and await in various C# files.
• ➕ Added .vscode/settings.json for SARIF viewer integration.
• ➕ Added GitVersion.yml for versioning configuration.
• 📖 Improved readability by renaming methods and variables for consistency.
• 💪 Followed best practices by using await using for asynchronous disposal.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
1	💪Best Practices	Use await using for asynchronous disposal in Worker.cs line 11	🟠Medium	🟠Medium
2	📖Readability	Use consistent naming for AsyncEventingBasicConsumer in Worker.cs	🟡Low	🟡Low
3	📖Readability	Use var keyword consistently in Worker.cs line 15	🟡Low	🟡Low

Issue Details and Fixes

1. Use await using for asynchronous disposal in Worker.cs line 11

Explanation

In the Worker.cs file, the connection and channel are created using await using, which is the recommended way to dispose of asynchronous resources. However, the QueueDeclareAsync method is not awaited, which can lead to potential issues if the method completes before the queue is declared.

Fix

await using var connection = await factory.CreateConnectionAsync();
await using var channel = await connection.CreateChannelAsync();
await channel.QueueDeclareAsync(
    queue: "task_queue",
    durable: false,
    exclusive: false,
    autoDelete: false,
    arguments: null
);

Explanation of Fix

The fix ensures that the QueueDeclareAsync method is awaited, allowing the queue to be properly declared before proceeding with the rest of the code.

2. Use consistent naming for AsyncEventingBasicConsumer in Worker.cs

Explanation

The AsyncEventingBasicConsumer is used in the Worker.cs file, but the naming is inconsistent with other parts of the code. Consistent naming improves readability and maintainability.

Fix

var consumer = new AsyncEventingBasicConsumer(channel);

Explanation of Fix

The fix ensures that the AsyncEventingBasicConsumer is consistently named across the codebase, improving readability.

3. Use var keyword consistently in Worker.cs line 15

Explanation

The var keyword is used inconsistently in the Worker.cs file. Consistent use of var can improve readability and maintainability.

Fix

var body = ea.Body;
var message = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(body.ToArray());

Explanation of Fix

The fix ensures that the var keyword is used consistently, which aligns with modern C# coding standards.

Missing Tests

To ensure the changes work as expected, consider adding the following tests:

1. Asynchronous Execution Test: Verify that all asynchronous methods execute correctly and handle exceptions as expected.
2. Queue Declaration Test: Ensure that queues are declared successfully and messages are published and consumed without errors.
3. CodeQL and DeepSource Integration Test: Validate that the CodeQL and DeepSource workflows run successfully and report any issues.
4. Versioning Test: Confirm that the versioning scheme in GitVersion.yml works as intended for different commit scenarios.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
React or reply to share your feedback with me!

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

12:09AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:09AM INF 69 commits scanned.
12:09AM INF scan completed in 78.6ms
12:09AM INF no leaks found

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud