Bump guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.711 to 2.2.716

[dependabot]

Bumps guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.711 to 2.2.716.

Release notes

Sourced from guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2's releases.

Release v2.2.716

Release 2.2.716 of github-file-reader-action-v2

What's Changed

• Bump eslint-plugin-github from 5.1.1 to 5.1.3 by @​dependabot in guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2#322

Full Changelog: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.715...v2.2.716

Release v2.2.715

Release 2.2.715 of github-file-reader-action-v2

What's Changed

• Bump eslint-plugin-github from 5.0.2 to 5.1.1 by @​dependabot in guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2#321

Full Changelog: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.714...v2.2.715

Release v2.2.714

Release 2.2.714 of github-file-reader-action-v2

What's Changed

• Bump @​types/node from 22.9.0 to 22.9.3 by @​dependabot in guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2#320

Full Changelog: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.713...v2.2.714

Release v2.2.713

Release 2.2.713 of github-file-reader-action-v2

What's Changed

• Bump typescript from 5.6.3 to 5.7.2 by @​dependabot in guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2#319

Full Changelog: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.712...v2.2.713

Release v2.2.712

Release 2.2.712 of github-file-reader-action-v2

What's Changed

• Bump gittools/actions from 2 to 3 by @​dependabot in guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2#317

Full Changelog: guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2@v2.2.711...v2.2.712

Commits

• 77481b2 Bump eslint-plugin-github from 5.1.1 to 5.1.3 (#322)
• 3caf391 Bump eslint-plugin-github from 5.0.2 to 5.1.1 (#321)
• 1673079 Bump @​types/node from 22.9.0 to 22.9.3 (#320)
• be00287 Bump typescript from 5.6.3 to 5.7.2 (#319)
• 3195e24 Bump gittools/actions from 2 to 3 (#317)
• See full diff in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

• Update guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from version 2.2.711 to 2.2.716 in the CI workflow.

[dependabot]

The following labels could not be found: github-actions, dependencies.

[korbit-ai]

By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the /korbit-review command in a comment.

[semanticdiff-com]

Review changes with  

[pr-code-reviewer]

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].}}

[instapr]

🚀 Code looks good! The dependency has been successfully updated from v2.2.711 to v2.2.716. No further changes are needed.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This is a dependency update PR that bumps the version of guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 from 2.2.711 to 2.2.716. The update includes several minor dependency updates in the action itself, including eslint-plugin-github, @types/node, typescript, and gittools/actions versions.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Updated GitHub Action version reference in workflow file	Updated action version from v2.2.711 to v2.2.716 in two identical workflow steps	.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
  this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codara-ai-code-review]

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

1. Inconsistent Action Versions
   /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
   The action guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 is used in both the "Read secrets-result.log" steps, but the version number has been updated for both. If there are any breaking changes between the two action versions (v2.2.711 and v2.2.716), it could lead to unpredictable behavior in the workflow.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

1. Consolidate Action Usage
   /.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
   Instead of having two separate steps using the same action for different conditions (always and failure), consider consolidating them into a single step with conditional logic based on the outcome of previous steps. This can reduce redundancy and improve the readability of the workflow.

   Example:

       - name: Read secrets-result.log
         uses: guibranco/[email protected]
         if: always()
         id: log
         with:
           path: secrets-result.log

   Then, handle the output based on the requirement of what action to take if the job succeeds versus if it fails, making it clear in the logic flow without repeating actions.

[guibranco]

Automatically approved by gstraccini[bot]

[sourcery-ai]

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, dependabot[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

[guibranco]

@dependabot squash and merge

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

10:47AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:47AM INF 95 commits scanned.
10:47AM INF scan completed in 70.5ms
10:47AM INF no leaks found

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud