Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Can we run self-hosted runners? #2319

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Collaborator

Are they faster?

Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from justinsb. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the are_self_hosted_runners_faster branch from 1ea5b67 to d17d59c Compare July 19, 2024 15:50
@justinsb
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Looks like the answer is no, that the big win would be replacing envtest with mock-kubeapiserver

/close

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot closed this Jul 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@justinsb: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Looks like the answer is no, that the big win would be replacing envtest with mock-kubeapiserver

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant