Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

338 agterberg cheng ci test #343

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

338 agterberg cheng ci test #343

merged 8 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

em-t
Copy link
Collaborator

@em-t em-t commented Mar 7, 2024

Resolves issue #338

I opened this as a draft at this point, since I would like some feedback before finalizing things.

Is it doing what it's supposed to? 😄

Are there any other CI tests to include? (Eg. the sources listed in the issue mention chi-squared test and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Chi-squared is already included in the toolkit, but I don't know how well it integrates with the data types used by the WofE functions, and I didn't look into the latter at all.)

What would be a useful output from the function?

@em-t em-t requested review from jtpesone and chudasama-bijal March 7, 2024 12:22
@nmaarnio
Copy link
Collaborator

nmaarnio commented Apr 8, 2024

@jtpesone and @chudasama-bijal , have you had time to look at this and #355 ? I am busy with other EIS issues and would like to avoid having to wrap up these Wofe issues.

@chudasama-bijal
Copy link
Collaborator

At this stage it should be sufficient to provide the Agterberg-Cheng CI test, implementation seems good to go.

@nmaarnio nmaarnio marked this pull request as ready for review October 23, 2024 07:16
@nmaarnio
Copy link
Collaborator

Okay thanks @chudasama-bijal , then I'll proceed to merge this!

@nmaarnio nmaarnio merged commit adb6380 into master Oct 23, 2024
6 checks passed
@nmaarnio nmaarnio deleted the 338-agterberg-cheng-CI-test branch October 23, 2024 07:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants