Add peer review

2.md

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+Interest of Content:
+Outstanding - Massive blocks of text are difficult to read, but the content there is good
+
+Consistency and Quality of Visual Presentation:
+Exemplary - good consistency, pleasing visual design, online new page is formatted differently that the rest, entertainment page does not respond to the window size changing.
+
+Quality of Written Presentation:
+Excellent - Lots of detail but a lot of it appears to be copied and pasted (such as the home page).
+
+Validity of HTML:
+Outstanding - Good quality HTML but not many comments
+
+Evidence of Collaboration:
+Perfect - All author info is written by another user, there are balanced contributions from members and it was completed over the weeks.
+