Defining the failed output by adding a description #153
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tion's parameters
…ms in report_params.py
…new configure_report input in test_output.py
rebekahrudd
requested review from
PCain02,
dyga01,
suppo01,
Chezka109 and
hemanialaparthi
|
See PR 154 for the PR that has the same feature. |
rebekahrudd
removed request for
gkapfham,
PCain02,
CalebKendra,
dyga01,
suppo01,
Chezka109 and
hemanialaparthi
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adding a failed output descript tag
Description
gatorgradeuses a tag to define what command ran by saying "Run this command: ", however, the failing lines of code thatgatorgradeproduces are not defined. This update defines the failed output with the line "Failing Command Output: ".Linked Issues
#152
closes: #152
Type of Change
Contributors
Reminder
To check this PR install
gatorgradefrom my fork and make sure you are on the branchcode_refactoringThis should be the output that you see: