You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description:
A feature that allows professors to manipulate the gatorgrade.yml file to attribute certain weights to certain checks when grading students' assignments. Right now, if there at 10 checks, each check is worth the same percentage, when in reality some checks are more important than others. For example; as GatorGrade stands if there is a check for code correctness, and a check for "Add Name Here", both of those checks influence the final grade the same.
Expected Behavior:
Instructors can take certain checks, and assign weighted values to them, so that way they have total control of how their assignments are graded. Giving instructors the ability to handcraft which checks they feel are more important.
Actual Behavior:
Right now, all checks are treated equally, and simple GatorGrade checks--which are still helpful-- are impacting students' grades just as much as a GatorGrade check that may target a course learning objective more.
Proposed Solution:
Implement a feature that allows instructors to manipulate how each GatorGrade check is weighted among the other checks to create a more precise grading tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @TitusSmith33 can you give an example of a check that would have more weight and then one that would have less weight and then how you would actually calculate a score? Thanks!
Description:
A feature that allows professors to manipulate the
gatorgrade.yml
file to attribute certain weights to certain checks when grading students' assignments. Right now, if there at 10 checks, each check is worth the same percentage, when in reality some checks are more important than others. For example; as GatorGrade stands if there is a check for code correctness, and a check for "Add Name Here", both of those checks influence the final grade the same.Expected Behavior:
Instructors can take certain checks, and assign weighted values to them, so that way they have total control of how their assignments are graded. Giving instructors the ability to handcraft which checks they feel are more important.
Actual Behavior:
Right now, all checks are treated equally, and simple GatorGrade checks--which are still helpful-- are impacting students' grades just as much as a GatorGrade check that may target a course learning objective more.
Proposed Solution:
Implement a feature that allows instructors to manipulate how each GatorGrade check is weighted among the other checks to create a more precise grading tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: