Fix Namespace Issue #773

[Gabeblis]

Committer Notes

Purpose

This PR makes constraint, baseline, and example content updates to resolve issue #773.

All Submissions:

• Have you selected the correct base branch per Contributing guidance?
• Have you set "Allow edits and access to secrets by maintainers"?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
• Have you squashed any non-relevant commits and commit messages? [instructions]
• Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
• If applicable, have all FedRAMP Documents Related to OSCAL Adoption affected by the changes in this issue have been updated.?
• If applicable, does this PR reference the issue it addresses and explain how it addresses the issue?

By submitting a pull request, you are agreeing to provide this contribution under the CC0 1.0 Universal public domain dedication.

[Gabeblis]

@Rene2mt I just opened this PR for reference, but it looks like there were some gaps. I believe mostly from the new constraints added since you originally opened PR #828.

[aj-stein-gsa]

So how do we want to handle this, I am comparing but you both are consistent with the @ns but the facet and system items for other field values and flags, so I am comparing this diff comparing the two directly before weighing in I guess.

https://github.com/Rene2mt/fedramp-automation/compare/issue-773-option2-constaints..Gabeblis:fedramp-automation:constraints/issue-773