Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust missing-response-components, warn on misplaced response components #969

Merged

Conversation

aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa commented Dec 5, 2024

Committer Notes

This is take three after #952 and wandmagic#18. This tweaks missing-response-components and adds another with level="WARN" just to be clear general NIST practice won't work with FedRAMP.

All Submissions:

  • Have you selected the correct base branch per Contributing guidance?
  • Have you set "Allow edits and access to secrets by maintainers"?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • Have you squashed any non-relevant commits and commit messages? [instructions]
  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • If applicable, does this PR reference the issue it addresses and explain how it addresses the issue?
  • If applicable, have all FedRAMP Documents Related to OSCAL Adoption affected by the changes in this issue have been updated? Bug fix for constraint(s) already spec'ed and documented.

By submitting a pull request, you are agreeing to provide this contribution under the CC0 1.0 Universal public domain dedication.

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa self-assigned this Dec 5, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa changed the base branch from master to develop December 5, 2024 20:14
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa linked an issue Dec 5, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa force-pushed the 939-fix-missing-response-components branch from e3eb37a to 862630e Compare December 5, 2024 20:18
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2024 20:19
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2024 20:19
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa force-pushed the 939-fix-missing-response-components branch from 862630e to 1e461ff Compare December 5, 2024 20:33
Copy link

@kyhu65867 kyhu65867 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few small things.

Copy link
Contributor

@Gabeblis Gabeblis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR looks good. Just one thing we need to address regarding the control-implementation-status constraint.

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa requested review from kyhu65867, Gabeblis and a team and removed request for kyhu65867 December 13, 2024 06:21
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa dismissed kyhu65867’s stale review December 13, 2024 06:22

Feedback addressed, this reviewer is out of office for a few days.

@Gabeblis
Copy link
Contributor

Good stuff!

@wandmagic wandmagic merged commit 95603a4 into GSA:develop Dec 13, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

by-component constraint enforced in wrong location
4 participants