Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update docs with docker install and other walkthrough improvements #666

Conversation

aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa commented Sep 9, 2024

Committer Notes

When merged, resolves #659.

All Submissions:

  • Have you selected the correct base branch per Contributing guidance?
  • Have you set "Allow edits and access to secrets by maintainers"?
  • Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
  • Have you squashed any non-relevant commits and commit messages? [instructions]
  • Have you added an explanation of what your changes do and why you'd like us to include them?
  • If applicable, does this PR reference the issue it addresses and explain how it addresses the issue?
  • If applicable, have all FedRAMP Documents Related to OSCAL Adoption affected by the changes in this issue have been updated.? Changes the development doc in this repo, not the user-facing docs website.

By submitting a pull request, you are agreeing to provide this contribution under the CC0 1.0 Universal public domain dedication.

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa self-assigned this Sep 9, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa force-pushed the 659-update-or-create-necessary-installation-documentation branch from b1d3725 to 487621e Compare September 10, 2024 00:07
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa reopened this Sep 10, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pushed to wrong branch for another PR. Restoring work and re-opened here for review tomorrow.

Be sure to talk about the constraints and their relationship to the tool,
do not just talk about the `oscal-cli` without context. Re-order some of
the info, talk about target audience before install instructions.
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa force-pushed the 659-update-or-create-necessary-installation-documentation branch from d6d5b30 to a9e68c1 Compare September 10, 2024 01:55
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa marked this pull request as ready for review September 10, 2024 14:22
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa requested a review from a team as a code owner September 10, 2024 14:22
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa force-pushed the 659-update-or-create-necessary-installation-documentation branch from c3a8821 to c209659 Compare September 10, 2024 18:56
Based on some more detailed feedback from @Rene2mt that matched other
comments from Dave in the PR.
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa force-pushed the 659-update-or-create-necessary-installation-documentation branch from e79c153 to 4e02e2d Compare September 10, 2024 19:32
Rene2mt
Rene2mt previously approved these changes Sep 10, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa merged commit 0083f06 into GSA:feature/external-constraints Sep 10, 2024
3 checks passed
aj-stein-gsa added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
)

* [skip ci] More appropriate README title for #659

* [skip ci] Context for constraints, tools for #659

Be sure to talk about the constraints and their relationship to the tool,
do not just talk about the `oscal-cli` without context. Re-order some of
the info, talk about target audience before install instructions.

* [skip ci] Remove dupe copy of 'who for?' for #659

* [skip ci] Subject is FR not only FR devs in #659

* [skip ci] No more header numbers, add headers #659

* [skip ci] Better intro and simple diagram for #659

* [skip ci] Docker install prerequisites for #659

* [skip ci] More install and command docs for #659

* [skip ci] Clearer wording on OCI tool for #659

* [skip ci]  Feedback for #659, re manual clone step

* [skip ci] Remove dangling this for #659

Thanks to @david-waltermire for catching that.

* [skip ci]  Align arguments docs, examples for #659

Based on some more detailed feedback from @Rene2mt that matched other
comments from Dave in the PR.

* Good catch, @gabelis, fix numbering for #659
aj-stein-gsa added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
)

* [skip ci] More appropriate README title for #659

* [skip ci] Context for constraints, tools for #659

Be sure to talk about the constraints and their relationship to the tool,
do not just talk about the `oscal-cli` without context. Re-order some of
the info, talk about target audience before install instructions.

* [skip ci] Remove dupe copy of 'who for?' for #659

* [skip ci] Subject is FR not only FR devs in #659

* [skip ci] No more header numbers, add headers #659

* [skip ci] Better intro and simple diagram for #659

* [skip ci] Docker install prerequisites for #659

* [skip ci] More install and command docs for #659

* [skip ci] Clearer wording on OCI tool for #659

* [skip ci]  Feedback for #659, re manual clone step

* [skip ci] Remove dangling this for #659

Thanks to @david-waltermire for catching that.

* [skip ci]  Align arguments docs, examples for #659

Based on some more detailed feedback from @Rene2mt that matched other
comments from Dave in the PR.

* Good catch, @gabelis, fix numbering for #659
brian-ruf pushed a commit to brian-ruf/fedramp-automation that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2024
…SA#666)

* [skip ci] More appropriate README title for GSA#659

* [skip ci] Context for constraints, tools for GSA#659

Be sure to talk about the constraints and their relationship to the tool,
do not just talk about the `oscal-cli` without context. Re-order some of
the info, talk about target audience before install instructions.

* [skip ci] Remove dupe copy of 'who for?' for GSA#659

* [skip ci] Subject is FR not only FR devs in GSA#659

* [skip ci] No more header numbers, add headers GSA#659

* [skip ci] Better intro and simple diagram for GSA#659

* [skip ci] Docker install prerequisites for GSA#659

* [skip ci] More install and command docs for GSA#659

* [skip ci] Clearer wording on OCI tool for GSA#659

* [skip ci]  Feedback for GSA#659, re manual clone step

* [skip ci] Remove dangling this for GSA#659

Thanks to @david-waltermire for catching that.

* [skip ci]  Align arguments docs, examples for GSA#659

Based on some more detailed feedback from @Rene2mt that matched other
comments from Dave in the PR.

* Good catch, @gabelis, fix numbering for GSA#659
This was referenced Nov 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🚢 Ready to Ship
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants