You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This paper[1] has a really interesting comparison between a simple evolutionary model and observed exoplanet densities. They match their model input (water mass fraction) to observed density, to constrain the water mass fraction on a given planet.
We could do something similar with PROTEUS, or at least make it simple to compare model outputs to the observed population. A simple plot of planet mass/radius/density on top of the population scatter would be an interesting start. Connected to #204, #162.
The PlanetS database can be accessed here [2], and downloaded in the VOTable (XML) format here[3].
This paper[1] has a really interesting comparison between a simple evolutionary model and observed exoplanet densities. They match their model input (water mass fraction) to observed density, to constrain the water mass fraction on a given planet.
We could do something similar with PROTEUS, or at least make it simple to compare model outputs to the observed population. A simple plot of planet mass/radius/density on top of the population scatter would be an interesting start. Connected to #204, #162.
The PlanetS database can be accessed here [2], and downloaded in the VOTable (XML) format here[3].
[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17394
[2] https://dace.unige.ch/exoplanets/
[3] https://dace.unige.ch/downloads/exoplanets/PLANETS.vot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: