Expose the stored subsystem name via the subsystem handle

[girstenbrei]

Closes #97

[Finomnis]

Would you mind adding a test for it as well?

[Finomnis]

Ideally, where you test two levels of nested subsystems to make sure the name gets properly constructed

[Finomnis]

Would mind extending the test to check the nested-ness of nested subsystems? :) sorry to be pedantic :D

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.32%. Comparing base (11c85eb) to head (8f3eff5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #98      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.30%   97.32%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines         669      672       +3     
  Branches      669      672       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          651      654       +3     
  Misses          3        3              
  Partials       15       15              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[girstenbrei]

Not minding at all, no problem:

I added an integration test (is the integration_test.rs the preferred location? It looked like a good candidate) with 2 nested subsystems and testing their respective generated names and that the name nest correctly.

I also added a small note in the original name() fn regarding how names are constructed. I think this should be documented somewhere, I just don't know if this is the correct location. Maybe the SubsystemBuilder::new would be better, what do you think?

Would mind extending the test to check the nested-ness of nested subsystems? :) sorry to be pedantic :D

I'm not quite sure what you mean, sorry: You want to test that nested subsystems are actually nested? And no worries about being pedantic, let's do it right.

Edit: Typo

[Finomnis]

That's exactly what I meant, that's perfect :)