Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add client validation tests #191

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add client validation tests #191

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Naseem77
Copy link
Contributor

@Naseem77 Naseem77 commented Oct 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced new test cases for validating configuration management in the FalkorDB client.
    • Enhanced coverage for handling valid and invalid configuration settings.
    • Added tests for getConfig and setConfig methods, ensuring proper functionality and exception handling.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several new test cases to the tests/createClient.spec.ts file, aimed at enhancing the testing coverage for the FalkorDB client. The changes include tests for the getConfig and setConfig methods, handling of invalid configuration settings, and validation of configuration modifications across various roles. These additions ensure that both valid and invalid scenarios for configuration management are thoroughly tested.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/createClient.spec.ts Added new test cases for:
  • Validation of getConfig and setConfig methods.
  • Handling of invalid configuration settings.
  • Validation of configuration modifications for various roles.

Possibly related PRs

  • Graph tests set3 #181: The changes in tests/createClient.spec.ts and the new test suite in the same file are directly related to the testing enhancements for the FalkorDB client, which aligns with the overall testing improvements introduced in the workflow and Jest configuration in this PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • AviAvni

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code we play,
New tests hop in, bright as day.
Configs set and values check,
With every test, we earn respect.
Invalid paths we deftly trace,
A robust client, we embrace! 🌟


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 118af1f and bda1678.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/createClient.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/createClient.spec.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
1 participant