Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

added retry_on_error to the conn object returned by the Is_sentinel f… #69

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 13, 2024

Conversation

MuhammadQadora
Copy link
Collaborator

@MuhammadQadora MuhammadQadora commented Oct 13, 2024

…unction

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced connection handling for sentinel setups in FalkorDB, improving reliability with the addition of a retry mechanism.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated the initialization method to better manage connection retries, ensuring smoother operation in error scenarios.

@MuhammadQadora MuhammadQadora linked an issue Oct 13, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request modify the __init__ method of the FalkorDB class in the falkordb.py file. Specifically, an additional parameter, retry_on_error, has been added to the method signature. The handling of the connection to the master node in a sentinel setup has been adjusted by removing the retry parameter from the master_for method call, allowing the connection logic to utilize the new retry_on_error parameter.

Changes

File Change Summary
falkordb/falkordb.py Updated __init__ method to include retry_on_error parameter and removed retry from master_for method call.

Possibly related PRs

  • add retry object to the connection #65: The changes in this PR involve modifying the __init__ method of the FalkorDB class to include a retry parameter in the connection logic, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that removed the retry parameter from the master_for method call.

Suggested reviewers

  • AviAvni
  • dudizimber

🐰 In the code where the sentinels play,
A new parameter joins the fray.
With retry_on_error now in sight,
Connections will handle errors right!
Hopping through logic, we make it clear,
FalkorDB's path is bright this year! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
falkordb/falkordb.py (1)

126-126: LGTM! Consider adding a docstring update.

The addition of the retry_on_error parameter to the master_for method call is a good improvement. It provides more granular control over error handling in sentinel connections, which aligns with the PR objective.

Consider updating the class docstring to mention this new parameter and its purpose. This will help users understand the new functionality without having to dive into the implementation details.

Example docstring addition:

"""
...
Args:
    ...
    retry_on_error (bool, optional): If True, retry on connection errors when using sentinel. Defaults to None.
    ...
"""
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6136bc and 4faa66a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • falkordb/falkordb.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.29%. Comparing base (c6136bc) to head (fde2062).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
falkordb/falkordb.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #69      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.26%   92.29%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines        2610     2610              
==========================================
+ Hits         2408     2409       +1     
+ Misses        202      201       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4faa66a and fde2062.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • falkordb/falkordb.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
falkordb/falkordb.py

[warning] 126-126: falkordb/falkordb.py#L126
Added line #L126 was not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (2)
falkordb/falkordb.py (2)

Line range hint 1-125: LGTM: Addition of retry_on_error parameter

The addition of the retry_on_error parameter to the __init__ method signature enhances the flexibility of error handling in the FalkorDB class. This change aligns well with the PR objectives.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff

124-124: Is_Sentinel may be undefined, or defined from star imports

(F405)


125-125: Sentinel_Conn may be undefined, or defined from star imports

(F405)


128-128: Is_Cluster may be undefined, or defined from star imports

(F405)


129-129: Cluster_Conn may be undefined, or defined from star imports

(F405)

🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 126-126: falkordb/falkordb.py#L126
Added line #L126 was not covered by tests


126-126: Verify the impact of removing retry parameter

The retry parameter has been removed from the master_for method call. Please confirm if this change intentionally modifies the retry behavior for sentinel connections. If so, ensure that the new behavior aligns with the expected functionality.

✅ Verification successful

Follow-up:


Impact of Removing retry Parameter Verified

No other instances of master_for method calls with the retry parameter were found in the codebase. The removal of the retry parameter appears to be intentional and does not impact other parts of the system.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of master_for method calls with retry parameter

# Test: Search for other master_for method calls with retry parameter
rg --type python 'master_for.*retry'

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other occurrences of master_for method calls with retry parameter

# Test: Search for other master_for method calls with retry parameter using the correct file type
rg --type py 'master_for.*retry'

Length of output: 34

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 126-126: falkordb/falkordb.py#L126
Added line #L126 was not covered by tests

@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@

if Is_Sentinel(conn):
self.sentinel, self.service_name = Sentinel_Conn(conn, ssl)
conn = self.sentinel.master_for(self.service_name, ssl=ssl, retry=retry)
conn = self.sentinel.master_for(self.service_name, ssl=ssl)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add test coverage for the modified line

The static analysis tool indicates that the modified line 126 is not covered by tests. Consider adding test cases to cover this change and ensure the new behavior works as expected.

Would you like assistance in generating test cases for this change?

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 126-126: falkordb/falkordb.py#L126
Added line #L126 was not covered by tests

@dudizimber dudizimber merged commit d0671f6 into main Oct 13, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@dudizimber dudizimber deleted the 68-add-retry_on_error-to-the-sentinel branch October 13, 2024 12:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

removed unnecessary retry and retry on error in the master_for function add retry_on_error to the sentinel
2 participants