Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix #40 - don't content on external PRs #41

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

gkorland
Copy link
Contributor

@gkorland gkorland commented Apr 15, 2024

Avoid running maven-dependency-submission-action on external PRs with no write rights

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced GitHub workflow permissions to support new operations.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The update in the GitHub Actions workflow specifically enhances security and control by introducing a new permissions setting for content management. It ensures that the Maven Dependency Tree Dependency Submission step only runs if the appropriate write permissions are available, thereby safeguarding the process.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/.../maven.yml Added permissions with contents: write and conditional check for write permissions in a specific step.

Poem

🐇💻🌟
In the realm of code, where the bits align,
A small change makes the workflow shine.
Permissions set, with care so fine,
Ensuring safety, line by line.
Hop, hop, hop, in the digital vine! 🌿🌟


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1ed327 and 288e5ea.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/maven.yml (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/maven.yml (2)

17-19: The addition of explicit contents: write permissions is a crucial security enhancement.


54-54: The conditional check ensures that the Maven Dependency Tree Dependency Submission step only executes with the appropriate permissions, enhancing security.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@gkorland gkorland linked an issue Apr 15, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.08%. Comparing base (a1ed327) to head (288e5ea).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #41   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     72.08%   72.08%           
  Complexity      213      213           
=========================================
  Files            25       25           
  Lines           695      695           
  Branches         64       64           
=========================================
  Hits            501      501           
  Misses          162      162           
  Partials         32       32           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gkorland gkorland merged commit 1fa6736 into master Apr 15, 2024
6 checks passed
@gkorland gkorland deleted the gkorland-patch-1 branch April 15, 2024 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CI fails on external PR
2 participants